Courts Grappling with Realities of Retaliatory Arrests

Patrick Jaicomo, a Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice, dives into the complex world of retaliatory arrests. He discusses the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that reshapes how courts assess whether an arrest was made out of retaliation. Jaicomo highlights the burden of proof for plaintiffs, emphasizing the implications for free speech and public engagement. He also explores how the Gonzales v. Trevino case influences current standards, underlining the delicate balance between law enforcement practices and citizens' rights.