
Erasing Encephalitis — Why Vaccine Brain Injuries Became Autism
Oct 3, 2025
The podcast dives into the controversial links between vaccinations and neurological injuries, revealing a troubling history of suppressed research. It discusses how terms like 'autism' have replaced 'encephalitis' to obscure severe vaccine-related damages. The hosts critique the use of ambiguous language in public health messaging that minimizes accountability. They underscore the impact of these changes on compensation and the public's understanding, urging vigilance in evaluating claims and vaccination strategies.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Hidden Evidence Shapes Belief
- The episode questions whether the claim that vaccines never contribute to autism rests on suppressed evidence and shifting language.
- Hosts argue some comparative studies showing higher chronic illness in vaccinated children do not reach public view.
Published Research May Be Biased
- The hosts claim analyses often show vaccinated children have 3–7× higher rates of chronic illness.
- They say disruptive results frequently remain unpublished or sidelined to preserve the prevailing narrative.
Framing Trumps Precision
- Language framing like 'safe and effective' lacks precise definitions and enables implied certainty without accountability.
- The episode points to PR tactics that craft ambiguous messaging and then amplify it as settled fact.
