The Triumph of Fear: Domestic Surveillance and Political Repression from McKinley Through Eisenhower
Apr 4, 2025
auto_awesome
Patrick Eddington, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and author of "The Triumph of Fear," delves into the historical roots of federal surveillance and political repression in America. He discusses the rise of government surveillance post-McKinley's assassination, highlighting Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson's expansive measures. Eddington explores the tension between civil liberties and national security during wartime, as well as the legacy of these practices from early 20th century through the Cold War, revealing how fear continues to shape modern governance.
The history of federal surveillance and political repression reveals a pattern of increasing government control in response to societal fears and dissenting ideologies.
Significant civil liberties violations during the 20th century, especially under war-related pressures, illustrate the dangers of executive overreach and systemic targeting based on political beliefs.
Deep dives
Historical Roots of Surveillance
The episode examines how America's existing infrastructure for federal surveillance and political repression developed from a number of historical events and societal fears. Initially, political repression methods were minimal, primarily relying on the post office and Congress, as evident with the passing of the Alien and Sedition Acts shortly after the Constitution's enactment. The narrative shifts dramatically after the assassination of President McKinley in 1901, driven by an anarchist, which prompted a nationwide crackdown on perceived threats. The Anarchist Exclusion Act of 1903 marked a turning point, showcasing the government's willingness to use legislative power to counter dissenting ideas, particularly targeting foreign nationals and influencing the trajectory of national security measures.
Growth of Government Surveillance
The rise of industrialization and the ensuing labor movements during the late 19th century drove a significant uptick in government surveillance and repression. The increase in political ideologies such as socialism and anarchism compelled the government to act, with the assassination of McKinley serving as a catalyst for widespread monitoring of dissenters. Theodore Roosevelt's administration expanded the role of the Secret Service, transforming it into an instrument for political surveillance rather than solely for protecting the president. This era's notable incidents, like investigations into political adversaries such as Senator William Borah, revealed how federal agencies were increasingly utilized for political purposes rather than for legitimate criminal investigations.
Politicization of Civil Liberties
World War I marked a dramatic juncture for civil liberties, as expressions of dissent became increasingly repressed under President Woodrow Wilson. The episode highlights Wilson's targeting of German Americans and anti-war factions, exemplified by the American Union Against Militarism, which evolved into the ACLU, an organization subsequently targeted by the administration. Legislative responses, such as the Espionage Act and the later Sedition Act of 1918, imposed severe penalties on dissent and criticism of the U.S. government, leading to notable cases where congressmen faced repercussions for their speeches. This period emphasized the recurring theme of executive overreach during times of conflict, significantly impacting civil liberties in the name of national security.
Legacy of Executive Surveillance Programs
The episode culminates with a discussion of the enduring legacy of surveillance and repression policies established during the presidencies of Truman and Eisenhower. The creation of the National Security Agency and the implementation of the Federal Employee Loyalty Program illustrate the systematic targeting of individuals based on their political beliefs, often without due process. Notably, the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II under Executive Order 9066 signifies one of the most egregious civil liberties violations in U.S. history. The narrative concludes by pointing out how historical precedents set during this time continue to influence modern practices of surveillance, urging vigilance against the reemergence of similar abuses of power.