Neil Van Leeuwen, "Religion As Make-Believe: A Theory of Belief, Imagination, and Group Identity" (Harvard UP, 2023)
Sep 17, 2024
auto_awesome
Neil Van Leeuwen, an author and researcher, delves into the intriguing realm of belief, imagination, and group identity. He argues that religious beliefs function similarly to imaginative play, creating a layered cognitive experience. Van Leeuwen discusses how communal identities are shaped through these beliefs and contrasts emotional engagement with factual foundations. He also highlights the interplay of prayer and action, the dynamics of faith versus doubt, and the complexities of childhood belief systems, ultimately revealing that belief often transcends empirical evidence.
Religious beliefs operate as imaginative constructs rather than merely factual assertions, allowing individuals to define group identity through make-believe.
The two-map cognitive structure enables individuals to distinguish between factual reality and imaginative scenarios, informing their engagement with religion.
Doubts coexist with strong faith due to compartmentalization of beliefs, illustrating how cognitive mechanisms support commitment even amidst uncertainty.
Deep dives
Understanding Religious Beliefs
Religious beliefs are distinct from ordinary factual beliefs, as articulated in cognitive terms. These beliefs function more like imaginative attitudes akin to make-believe play rather than verifiable facts. The author argues that while such beliefs may appear similar in terms of the language used, they represent different ways of relating to ideas. This leads to the conclusion that religious credence operates independently from evidential support, allowing individuals to hold onto their faith in a compartmentalized manner.
Cognitive Structures in Play
The author introduces the concept of a two-map cognitive structure to explain how individuals navigate imaginative play. In play, individuals access both a factual layer and an imaginative layer, allowing them to differentiate between reality and their created scenarios. This dual processing helps children, for example, engage in pretend play while still recognizing the physical properties of their environment. The ability to track reality while engaging with imaginative constructs is crucial to understanding how religious beliefs may likewise function.
Differences Between Factual Beliefs and Imaginative Attitudes
Factual beliefs and imaginative attitudes are governed by distinct principles, impacting how individuals process information. Factual beliefs are involuntary and tied to evidence, while imaginative attitudes allow for voluntary manipulation of ideas without the need for factual verification. The interplay between these types demonstrates that individuals can compartmentalize their beliefs depending on the context, leading to a flexibility in thought that is significant in understanding religious credence. Moreover, this differentiation reveals why some individuals can simultaneously hold strong faith and acknowledge doubts about specific doctrines.
The Role of Doubt in Religious Belief
Doubt is a common experience among the deeply faithful, often producing anxiety about the strength of their beliefs. In many religious traditions, particularly Christianity, the expectation of certainty creates an internal conflict when doubts arise, causing stress and potential crisis. The author highlights that while individuals may experience doubts, their adherence to faith can remain robust, as these feelings do not necessarily align with an evidence-based evaluation of beliefs. This suggests that cognitive mechanisms at play within religious contexts allow for an ongoing commitment to belief that coexists with uncertainty.
Religious Extremism and Costly Signaling
Religious extremism may be understood through the lens of costly signaling, where extreme behaviors serve to demonstrate group loyalty rather than a straightforward belief in doctrines. Such actions often present a form of symbolic expression that encompasses community identity while distancing from evidence-based reasoning. The complexities surrounding motivations for extreme actions highlight that individuals may not solely rely on factual beliefs but leverage imaginative attitudes to justify their behavior. Thus, religious extremism reflects a multifaceted interplay of identity, belief, and psychological dynamics.
It is an intuitive truth that religious beliefs are different from ordinary factual beliefs. We understand that a belief in God or the sacredness of scripture is not the same as believing that the sun will rise again tomorrow or that flipping the switch will turn on the light.
When someone pretends, they navigate the world on two levels simultaneously, or as Van Leeuwen describes it, by consulting two maps. The first map is that of factual, mundane reality. The second is a map of the imagined world. This second map is then superimposed on top of the first to create a multi-layered cognitive experience that is consistent with both factual and imaginary understandings.
With this model in mind, we can understand religious belief, which Van Leeuwen terms religious "credence", as a form of make-believe that people use to define their group identity and express values they hold as sacred. Religious communities create a religious-credence map which sits on top of their factual-belief map, creating an experience where ordinary objects and events are rich with sacred and supernatural significance.
Recognizing that our minds process factual and religious beliefs in fundamentally different ways allows us to gain deeper understanding of the complex individual and group psychology of religious faith.