
Street Life Round Table: Are Street Photography Competitions Worth It?
Aug 14, 2025
This discussion features Sam Ferris, organizer of the Aussie Street festival, who highlights transparency in street photography events. Dave Cassini, a documentary photographer, shares his experiences with reputable contests versus exploitative ones. Eduardo Ortiz, a judging expert, addresses ethical concerns like nepotism in competitions. Together, they advocate for genuine community engagement and caution against money-grab contests, urging photographers to pursue transparent and meaningful opportunities.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Competitions Can Fund Real Community Events
- Many festivals run competitions to fund exhibitions, talks and guest appearances rather than to profit from entrants.
- Sam Ferris says transparent fees and printed exhibitions tie entry money directly to community value.
Opaque Judging Erodes Trust
- Lack of transparency around judging and administration damages trust and community value.
- Eduardo Ortiz left a judging panel over opaque processes and potential bias among judges.
Enter Only If There’s Real Exposure
- Only enter competitions that clearly produce an exhibition or meaningful exposure for finalists.
- Dave Cassini recommends paying entry fees only when you know your work will be printed or publicly shown.



