The podcast discusses the policy of not negotiating with terrorists, exploring the history of pirate attacks and their influence on this policy. It also delves into the significance of body armor loadouts, major terrorist attacks like 9/11, and the concept of just war. The importance of not negotiating with terrorists is emphasized, along with the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the role of Hamas, and the need for a strong response to terrorist attacks. The chapter concludes with a call for unity and support.
Considering the historical context of terrorist attacks like 9/11, peace between the United States and terrorist groups like al-Qaeda or ISIS may not be feasible or advisable.
Engaging in war can sometimes be necessary to achieve a better long-term outcome, as seen in the cases of the Civil War and World War II, emphasizing the importance of stopping terrorists to ensure peace and freedom.
Deep dives
The Context of Peace in the Middle East
In the podcast episode, the speaker discusses the sentiment for peace in the Middle East, highlighting that people are calling for an end to the fighting between Israel and Palestine. However, the speaker emphasizes the importance of considering the context, particularly the history of terrorist attacks such as 9/11. The speaker questions the idea of peace between the United States and terrorist groups like al-Qaeda or ISIS, and argues that while peace is desirable, it is necessary to understand the context in order to appreciate the complexity of the situation.
Just Wars and the Middle East
The podcast delves into the concept of 'just wars' and argues that sometimes it is necessary to engage in war in order to achieve a better long-term outcome. The example of the Civil War is cited, where the sacrifice of lives led to the liberation of a nation that practiced slavery. The speaker also mentions the importance of the United States joining World War II after the Pearl Harbor attack, highlighting the need to have allies in times of war. The speaker proposes that a war against terrorists can be considered a just war, emphasizing the importance of stopping terrorists in order to ensure peace and freedom.
The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict and the Question of Negotiating with Terrorists
The podcast explores the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and questions the association of Hamas with Palestine. The speaker raises the question of why Palestine does not give up Hamas if they want to avoid further conflict with Israel. Two possible options are presented: either Palestine lacks the power to eject Hamas, indicating a fallen territory in need of outside help, or they choose to protect Hamas, making them complicit with the terrorist group. The speaker argues against negotiating with terrorists, pointing out that it emboldens them, strengthens them, and postpones an inevitable conflict. The importance of self-defense and the need for a strong homeland is also emphasized, referencing the need for an armed populace.
Since the early years of the United States, the official policy was to not negotiate with terrorists. It came from period when pirates would take our ships and ask for ransom. We learned that if you pay them now, you are incentivizing future attacks. Should that policy change?
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode