
Energy Gang Permitting reform and the politics of building the grid | Live from the ACORE Grid Forum in Washington, D.C.
Oct 23, 2025
Matt Christiansen, former General Counsel at FERC, navigates the intricate permitting process, highlighting NEPA reviews as major bottlenecks. Elizabeth Horner explains the political landscape and the need for bipartisan reforms. Daniel Palken discusses the urgent demand from data centers driving the need for accelerated transmission planning. The group debates the balance between environmental protections and faster approvals, emphasizing the critical need for modernized permitting laws to meet rising energy demands.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
NEPA Creates Time And Litigation Bottlenecks
- NEPA reviews are extremely time-intensive and fact-heavy, often taking years to produce EIS or EA documents.
- Litigation over voluminous records then frequently delays final investment decisions and construction.
Give Host Communities Real Benefits
- Ensure communities hosting infrastructure share tangible benefits rather than adding more process.
- Prioritize benefit-sharing over procedural layering to gain local support and speed builds.
Federal Role For Multi-State Lines
- The federal government can play a role for multi-state 'national interest' transmission lines where states undervalue broader benefits.
- Federal siting or backstop authority makes sense when benefits cross state borders and cannot be captured by one state.



