In the intersection of politics and technology, few innovations have had as significant an impact as online donation platforms. ActBlue, the Democratic Party's premiere fundraising tool, has revolutionized small-dollar contributions since its inception in 2004. However, recent internal turmoil at the organization is raising serious questions about both its future and about the broader landscape of political donations.

A Game-Changer for Democrats

ActBlue was an early pioneer in digital fundraising, allowing Democratic candidates and progressive causes to tap into small-dollar donors efficiently. Through gamification and mobile accessibility, the platform made it easy for supporters to donate with just a few clicks, contributing billions of dollars to campaigns over the years.

By 2024, ActBlue played a crucial role in helping President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris amass over $1.5 billion in campaign funds, outpacing the Republican counterpart, WinRed, which raised $900 million for Donald Trump. The platform also helped Democrats dominate small-dollar fundraising in Senate races, with candidates like Sherrod Brown (Ohio) and John Tester (Montana) outraising their Republican opponents, despite ultimately losing their races.

A Leadership Exodus and Rising Concerns

Despite its success, ActBlue is now facing a crisis. In February 2025, seven senior staff members resigned suddenly, including the organization’s chief legal officer, vice president for customer service, and a technical expert with 14 years of experience. This mass departure was alarming enough that two employee unions publicly voiced concerns, warning that confidence in the organization’s stability was eroding.

This followed a December 2024 letter from over 140 political stakeholders — consultants, campaign staff, donors, and academics — urging ActBlue to implement stronger safeguards to prevent donor exploitation.

One particularly cryptic development came when a newly appointed technical leader at ActBlue reminded employees of whistleblower protections, a warning that suggests internal concerns about potential misconduct.

Allegations of Financial Misconduct

While ActBlue’s success has been attributed to its superior technology and network effect, some critics argue that there may be fraudulent activity behind its fundraising dominance.

A GOP strategist, Mark Block, filed a racketeering lawsuit against ActBlue, alleging that his identity was stolen to make 385 fraudulent donations totaling $884. He claims that these small donations — each under $200 — were used to exploit a loophole in Federal Election Commission (FEC) reporting requirements.

This practice, known as “smurfing,” is a form of money laundering that involves breaking large donations into smaller, untraceable amounts to avoid detection. Block’s lawsuit cites donation receipts from an old campaign email account, showing repeated micro-donations averaging just $3.24 each, many of which he did not authorize.

Additionally, there have been reports of:

* Elderly individuals discovering numerous small donations in their names without their knowledge.

* Foreign nationals using surrogates to funnel money into U.S. elections, a violation of campaign finance laws.

These allegations, combined with the sudden staff exodus, suggest that ActBlue could be facing a major financial scandal.

The Potential Fallout

If these accusations are substantiated, the implications for ActBlue — and Democratic fundraising — could be severe:

* Small donors may hesitate to contribute if concerns about fraud persist, resulting in a loss of trust in one or both parties.

* The FEC or other watchdogs may launch formal investigations, leading to stricter oversight.

* With ActBlue in turmoil, Democrats may struggle to replicate their past fundraising successes in upcoming elections.

There is also speculation that WinRed, the Republican alternative, could face similar scrutiny. If both major fundraising platforms are found to have engaged in unethical practices, the entire online political donation system could be upended.

Looking Ahead to 2028

ActBlue’s situation is still unfolding, but one thing is clear: The Democratic Party’s dominant fundraising machine is in serious jeopardy. If ActBlue collapses or loses credibility, Democrats will need to quickly find an alternative — something that won’t be easy given the platform’s deep integration with campaign operations.

With the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential race on the horizon, the future of small-dollar political fundraising is more uncertain than ever.

Chapters

00:00:00 - Intro

00:01:05 - Interview with Matt Laslo

00:21:00 - ActBlue Chaos

00:32:22 - Update

00:33:46 - US/Canadian Tariffs

00:35:29 - Ukraine Ceasefire

00:37:35 - Mahmoud Khalil’s Arrest

00:40:17 - Interview with Jen Briney

01:15:08 - Wrap-up

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe

A Conversation with John Lithgow