Was Steve Bannon’s four-month prison sentence for defying a January 6 Committee subpoena fair?

What are the implications of a new ruling where a federal judge writes that former President Donald Trump made false allegations of voter fraud in a Georgia lawsuit even though his lawyers informed him the data was wrong?

Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance discuss in this sample from the CAFE Insider podcast.

The full episode covers:

– The January 6 Committee’s subpoena to Trump for testimony and document production;

– Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s decision to temporarily freeze the subpoena to Senator Lindsey Graham from a Georgia grand jury in the investigation into interference in the 2020 election;

– The reports indicating that prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence to charge Trump with obstruction in relation to the Mar-a-Lago documents investigation; and

– Special Counsel John Durham’s failed prosecution of an analyst who contributed to the Steele Dossier.

Stay informed. For analysis of the most important legal and political issues of our time, try the membership for one month for $1.00: www.cafe.com/insider. You’ll get access to full episodes of the podcast, and other exclusive benefits.

This podcast is brought to you by CAFE Studios and Vox Media Podcast Network.

REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS:

John Eastman v. Bennie Thomspon, et al., U.S. District Court Central District of California, order re privilege of remaining documents, 10/19/22

“Bannon Sentenced to 4 Months in Prison for Contempt of Congress,” NYT, 10/21/22

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Trey Wilder shares his story