Investigative journalist Jacob Goldberg exposes the UN's greenwashing of its climate neutrality claims. The UN performs no checks on the carbon credits it buys, linked to protest, rainforest destruction, and indigenous dispossession. The podcast explores the damaging effects of government subsidies, problems with carbon offsetting, corrupt deals, challenges in journalism, and the greenwashing of the Teles Pierce Dam in Brazil.
The UN's claim of being climate neutral was exposed as misleading, as they purchased low-quality carbon credits from projects causing environmental harm and displacing indigenous communities.
The investigation highlighted the flaws in the concept of carbon credits, questioning their effectiveness and the UN's credibility in addressing the climate crisis effectively.
Deep dives
Carbon credits of UN projects linked to environmental damage and displacement
An investigation into the UN's claims of being a climate neutral organization found that some of the projects they purchased carbon credits from were causing environmental damage and displacing indigenous communities. At least a dozen projects, including a large hydropower dam in Brazil, were targets of mass protests and were accused of not adequately compensating affected communities. The investigation revealed that the UN was buying low-quality carbon credits from projects that experts considered least likely to have reduced carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The UN's reliance on outdated standards and failure to differentiate between project types raised concerns about misleading the public and promoting ineffective solutions to the climate crisis.
The flawed concept of carbon credits
Carbon credits, an idea that allows for the offsetting of emissions, have been criticized for their lack of effectiveness and potential harm. The investigation highlighted the flawed concept of carbon credits, where reductions in greenhouse gases are claimed based on projects that may not have actually reduced emissions or would have happened anyway. The use of low-quality carbon credits and the reliance on the outdated clean development mechanism standards led to the UN's misleading claim of being climate neutral. The flaws in the carbon credit system raise questions about the credibility of these offsetting measures and their ability to address the climate crisis effectively.
Responsibility of the UN and the need for reform
The UN, particularly the UNFCCC, the entity responsible for leading global climate efforts, was called upon to investigate the low-quality carbon credits it purchased and to revise its claim of climate neutrality. The investigation shed light on the gap between the UN's public messaging and its failure to address concerns regarding harmful projects and outdated carbon credit standards. The need for reform within the UN and the journalism community was also highlighted, with a focus on holding institutions accountable and raising public awareness about ineffective solutions. It emphasized the importance of questioning and reevaluating the frameworks and practices that perpetuate misleading information and hinder effective climate action.
Journalism's role and limitations
The investigation exposed the challenges faced by journalists in effecting change in the face of large institutions and systemic issues. Though journalism plays a critical role in uncovering and reporting on important issues, the limited impact it can have on global crises like climate change was acknowledged. The structural problems within organizations and the lack of responsiveness to critical questions and evidence indicate the need for broader reforms and collective efforts to tackle the root causes of these problems. Despite the obstacles, journalists strive to inform the public and spur action, even in the face of limited prospects for immediate change.
“I don't think you want an organisation that is misleading the public about its achievements addressing the climate crisis, to necessarily be the one leading the global effort to do something about the climate crisis.”
The UN claims they're "climate neutral"—it couldn't be farther from the truth.
A recent investigation done by Mongabay and the New Humanitarian revealed many carbon credit projects the UN buys are linked to protest, rainforest destruction and dispossession of indigenous people. I'm joined by reporter Jacob Goldberg who investigated this story for over a year.
Shockingly, he reveals the UN performs no checks on the carbon credits they buy—and did not respond to the reporters once they raised the alarm. As he says during the episode—can we trust an institution that can’t even keep track of the harm it’s doing to really lead the world through the climate crisis?
Planet: Critical investigates why the world is in crisis—and what to do about it. Support the project by becoming a free or paid subscriber.