Gina McCarthy, former EPA administrator and White House National Climate Advisor, dives into the shifting priorities of the Environmental Protection Agency under new leadership. She discusses the concerning rollback of climate protections and the vital role of grassroots movements in safeguarding the environment. McCarthy highlights how many states and cities are stepping up to address climate issues amid federal inaction. Additionally, they delve into the ongoing political battles over climate funding and the importance of global cooperation in tackling environmental challenges.
The current EPA leadership is criticized for prioritizing deregulation and energy dominance over essential environmental protections, risking public health.
Local governments are increasingly stepping up to address environmental challenges, demonstrating a grassroots movement against federal inaction on climate issues.
Deep dives
Shifts in EPA Focus and Priorities
The current leadership of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is drawing criticism for shifting its focus away from traditional environmental protections towards promoting energy dominance and artificial intelligence advancements. Under Administrator Lee Zeldin, the agency appears to prioritize deregulation, which could lead to more allowances for companies to pollute without stringent oversight. This shift is highlighted by increasing greenhouse gas emissions linked to AI initiatives, suggesting a conflict between the EPA's new direction and its historic mission of protecting air and water quality. The administration's efforts to roll back essential regulations pose significant risks to both environmental health and the public well-being.
Concerns Over Environmental Integrity
Former EPA administrator Gina McCarthy expresses concern that the current administration's actions undermine the foundational goals of the agency, which traditionally include safeguarding public health and tackling climate change. Zeldin’s plans involve reconsidering critical environmental rules, including the 2009 finding that greenhouse gases are harmful. Such actions reflect a broader strategy outlined in Project 2025, aiming to reduce the federal government's role in environmental regulation. The possibility of eliminating crucial protections could reverse decades of progress made in environmental health and safety.
Local and Community Responses
In response to federal inaction, local governments and communities are stepping up to fill the gaps left by the EPA's shifting priorities. Initiatives at state and municipal levels are gaining momentum as leaders recognize the urgent need for effective environmental protection. This grassroots movement underscores the heightened awareness among citizens and local officials regarding the impacts of climate change and pollution. The drive to take charge at local levels could provide a vital counterbalance to federal policies that are perceived as indifferent or harmful to ecological integrity and public health.
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin has been busy since assuming office earlier this year. Zeldin's been pushing President Donald Trump's climate agenda by rolling back Biden-era climate protections, deregulating businesses, and cutting staff at the agency. Former EPA Administrator and White House National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy joins us to discuss how states and cities are stepping up to protect their communities and the planet.