Legal AF by MeidasTouch Judge Cannon DISMISSES Trump Document Case
8 snips
Jul 15, 2024 The hosts dive into the surprising dismissal of the Mar-A-Lago document case by Judge Aileen Cannon, questioning the legality of the special counsel's appointment. They discuss the profound implications and potential appeals, analyzing the flaws in Cannon's reasoning. The conversation touches on statutory foundations that support the Attorney General's authority and the political ramifications related to timing. Additionally, potential grounds for recusal are explored, alongside predictions about the next steps for the DOJ.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Dismissal Based On Appointment And Funding
- Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the Mar-a-Lago superseding indictment for appointment-clause and appropriations concerns. The order confines its effect to this proceeding and preserves classified-information protections.
Court's View On Smith's Officer Status
- Judge Cannon treated Jack Smith as an officer whose duties exceed those of an inferior officer, requiring presidential appointment and Senate confirmation. She concluded lack of that process required dismissal of the case.
Thomas Concurrence Influenced The Ruling
- Ben Meiselas and others highlight heavy reliance on Justice Clarence Thomas's concurrence as legal cover for Cannon's ruling. That concurrence signaled skepticism about special-counsel appointments and was cited repeatedly.