The Remnant Radio's Podcast The Hypostatic Union; The Condemnation of Eutychianism; And Chalcedonian Definition
Oct 28, 2021
Explore the intricate debates surrounding Christ's dual nature, focusing on key figures like Eutyches and Pope Leo. Discover how the Chalcedonian Definition clarified theological confusion, emphasizing Christ's genuine humanity while preserving his divine nature. The discussion highlights the importance of church councils in shaping doctrine and addresses the implications of early Christology for contemporary faith. Listeners are encouraged to reflect on the necessity of humility and charity in theological disagreements.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Nicene Faith Underlies Christological Debates
- The Council debates aimed to preserve the Nicene faith while clarifying how divinity and humanity unite in Christ.
- The formula of union failed to settle tensions between Alexandrian and Antiochian emphases, leaving ambiguity exploited by later figures.
Eutyches' One-Nature Slide Sparked Crisis
- Eutyches swung toward Apollinarian-style language, claiming two natures before incarnation and one after.
- That collapse of distinctions suggested the divine subsumed the human, provoking major controversy.
Early Church 'Cancel Culture' Observation
- Joshua compares Eutyches' controversy to an early example of cancel culture and public fear of saying the wrong thing.
- That climate pushed Eutyches into ambiguous, defensive language rather than careful theology.
