The Charlie Kirk Show
Why "Disparate Impact" Must Die ft. Kevin Hasset
Apr 24, 2025
Kevin Hassett, former Director of the National Economic Council, shares insights on the impacts of 'disparate impact' in American policies. He highlights how this legal doctrine affects business hiring practices and calls for a return to meritocracy. The discussion shifts to Trump's tariffs, exploring their role in supporting American industries and workers. Hassett also touches on recent tax negotiations and their importance amidst economic challenges, emphasizing optimism in financial strategies.
34:43
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The concept of 'disparate impact' undermines meritocracy by judging policies based on outcomes rather than intentions, affecting various sectors.
- Current economic strategies emphasize the need for protective tariffs to benefit American workers and improve trade negotiations for domestic industries.
Deep dives
Understanding Disparate Impact and Its Implications
The concept of 'disparate impact' emerges as a critical issue addressed in the recent executive order, which aims to reshape elements of equality and opportunity. This legal doctrine asserts that policies can be deemed discriminatory if they result in different outcomes for distinct racial groups, regardless of intent. A historical Supreme Court case, Griggs v. Duke Power Company, exemplifies this principle, where job requirements were outlawed due to their disproportionate effect on Black applicants. The implications of this doctrine have infiltrated numerous aspects of American life, leading to a regulatory climate that many argue stifles meritocracy and promotes mediocrity.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
