In this lively conversation, theologian Matthew Novenson discusses the weirdness of Paul, theological and historical approaches, first-century Judaism, hermeneutical relativism, the influence of religious commitments on interpretation, the identity of the 'Jew in secret' in Romans 2, and Paul's perspective on sin and Judaism.
Paul's criticism is not directed towards Judaism itself, but towards Gentile posers who adopt Judaism without understanding its true significance.
The distinction in Romans 2 is between those who practice piety for human approval versus those who do so for the approval of God.
Balancing historical criticism and theology is essential for a comprehensive understanding of Paul's letters and encourages constructive dialogue among scholars.
Deep dives
The Distinction Between Jews and Gentiles in Paul's Letters
In his book, Paul Then and Now, Dr. Matt Novinson discusses the distinction between Jews and Gentiles in Paul's letters. He argues that Paul's criticism is not directed towards Judaism itself, but rather towards the Gentile posers who adopt Judaism and try to adhere to its practices, such as circumcision, without understanding its true significance. Novinson highlights that for Paul, the main focus is on Jesus as the central difference between Paulinism and Judaism. He emphasizes that Paul sees Jesus, the crucified Messiah, as the stumbling block for Israel, rather than attributing systematic problems to Judaism. Furthermore, Novinson explores the importance of historical criticism in understanding the context and intentions behind Paul's letters, while also acknowledging the value of theological readings. Overall, his book aims to bridge the gap between different interpretations and encourages dialogue among scholars to gain a deeper understanding of Paul's message.
The Distinction Between Jews and Gentiles in Romans 2
In his analysis of Romans 2, Dr. Matt Novinson examines the distinction between Jews and Gentiles in this chapter of Paul's letter. He argues that Paul is addressing the phenomenon of Gentile posers, who are Gentiles trying to adopt Judaism without fully understanding its teachings. Novinson suggests that Paul's criticism is not directed towards Judaism itself, but rather towards the Gentiles who are misrepresenting or misapplying its practices. He highlights the contrast between those who practice their piety for human approval versus those who do so for the approval of God, and posits that Paul's critique is centered around hypocrisy rather than an inherent problem within Judaism. Novinson's analysis reveals the nuanced perspective Paul brings to the discussion of the Jew-Gentile distinction in Romans 2.
Paul's Engagement with Historical Criticism and Theology
In his book, Paul Then and Now, Dr. Matt Novinson explores the interplay between historical criticism and theology in Paul's letters. He emphasizes that historical criticism provides valuable tools for understanding the historical context and intentions behind Paul's writings, while theology offers insights into the theological significance and implications of his message. Novinson advocates for a balanced approach, where scholars can draw from both disciplines to gain a comprehensive understanding of Paul's thought. He acknowledges the differences and debates among scholars regarding specific interpretations, but also highlights the potential for constructive dialogue among various perspectives. Novinson's book encourages scholars to appreciate the diverse ways of reading and interpreting Paul's letters, fostering a greater appreciation for the richness and complexity of Pauline theology.
The Significance of Jesus in Paul's Critique
In his analysis of Paul's interactions with Judaism, Dr. Matt Novinson emphasizes the central role of Jesus in Paul's message. Novinson argues that Paul's critique is not aimed at Judaism as a whole, but rather focuses on Jesus as the central difference between Paulinism and Judaism. He notes that the stumbling block for Israel, according to Paul, is Jesus, the crucified Messiah. Novinson challenges the notion of Paul criticizing Judaism for its alleged systematized problems and instead asserts that Paul's critique arises from his belief in the redemptive power of Jesus. Novinson's analysis underscores the theological significance of Jesus in Paul's thought and highlights the pivotal role of Jesus in understanding the distinction between Paulinism and Judaism.
Encouraging Dialogue Among Different Readings of Paul
Dr. Matt Novinson's book, Paul Then and Now, promotes dialogue among different readings and interpretations of Paul's letters. Novinson argues for a more inclusive and open approach to scholarship, where scholars from various perspectives can learn from one another. He emphasizes the importance of bridging the gap between different interpretive traditions and encourages scholars to appreciate the value of diverse reading strategies. Novinson envisions his book as a catalyst for breaking down the silos within the scholarly community, fostering dialogue, and creating a space for mutual learning and understanding. Through his work, Novinson hopes to promote a more comprehensive and enriched interpretation of Paul's message.
Episode: Erin sits down with Matthew Novenson for a lively conversation on the weirdness of Paul, theological and historical approaches, first-century Judaism, and a range of other topics covered in […]
