Humanism Now | Secular Ethics, Curiosity and Compassionate Change 28. Susie Alegre on the Algorithmic Assault on Human Rights: How AI Threatens Our Core Freedoms
AI technologies pose significant threats to fundamental human rights, reinforcing historical biases and power imbalances. This week, we are joined by Susie Alegre, international human rights lawyer and author, to explore the impact of generative AI on gender and racial equality, labour markets, and information ecosystems.
Susie has worked for international NGOs like Amnesty International and organisations including the UN, the EU and the Council of Europe.
Susie has published two books covering the critical issue or technology's impact on human rights; “Freedom to Think” (2022) was a Financial Times Technology Book of the Year 2022 and shortlisted for the Royal Society of Literature Christopher Bland Prize 2023 and “Human Rights, Robot Wrongs: Being Human in the Age of AI” published in 2024.
The episode covers;
- How AI systems, like ChatGPT, perpetuate gender and racial biases
- The "Pygmalion" pattern in AI design
- Potential longterm effects on skills, education and social interactions
- The rise of "ultra-processed information" and its consequences for the internet
- Legal risks and the role of effective regulation
- Enforcement in addressing AI's human rights risks
- When AI applications may be valuable—and when they are not
📅 To learn more about Susie Alegre’s work, visit:
🔗 susiealegre.com
🔗 alegre.ai
🔗 CIGI Profile
📩 info@susiealegre.com
📷 @susiealegre
💼 Linkedin: Susie Alegre
Support Humanism Now & Join Our Community!
Follow @HumanismNowPod | YouTube | TikTok | Instagram | Facebook | Threads | X.com | BlueSky
Humanism Now is produced by Humanise Live, making podcasting easy for charities and social causes.
Contact us to get starting in podcasting today at humanise.live or hello@humanise.live
Music: Blossom by Light Prism
Podcast transcripts are AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. They are provided to make our content more accessible, but should not be considered a fully accurate record of the conversation.