Parker's Pensées
Academic Philosophy vs. Public Philosophy? | w/Joe Schmid [Bonus Episode]
Aug 7, 2022
In this enlightening discussion, philosopher Joe Schmid tackles the differences between academic and public philosophy. He argues that anyone engaged in philosophical thought can be considered a philosopher, challenging traditional notions of authority. Schmid highlights the appeal of continental philosophy for its relatability, compared to the technical barriers of analytic philosophy. He advocates for a synthesis of both approaches to make philosophical ideas more accessible, touching on contemporary issues like the simulation hypothesis and NFTs.
29:40
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The podcast emphasizes that anyone who actively engages with philosophical ideas can identify as a philosopher, regardless of formal credentials.
- It highlights the dominance of continental philosophy in public discourse and the necessity for analytic philosophers to adopt more accessible communication strategies.
Deep dives
Defining a Philosopher
The discussion explores the criteria for being considered a philosopher, questioning whether formal education or publication is necessary for this designation. The speakers suggest that many individuals who engage with philosophical texts and ideas can be classified as philosophers, even if they lack advanced degrees. They emphasize inclusivity, arguing that anyone who practices philosophy—through reading, discussing, or thinking critically—can claim the title. This perspective challenges the traditional notion that only those with academic credentials are legitimate philosophers.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
