Drew FitzGerald, a telecom reporter for the Wall Street Journal, delves into the intersection of technology and politics. He discusses how the FCC, under Brendan Carr, may push forward Trump-era policies that target free speech and content moderation. FitzGerald also addresses Meta’s controversial dismantling of DEI programs and how new political shifts could shape the landscape of media regulation. The conversation highlights the implications for internet users and the evolving role of regulatory bodies in the tech realm.
Meta's reduction in content moderation and diversity programs reflects a significant shift towards more permissive online policies amid political changes.
Brendan Carr's leadership at the FCC signals an aggressive regulatory focus on media companies, potentially affecting merger reviews and content moderation practices.
Deep dives
Meta's Shift on Content Moderation
Meta's recent decision to scale back content moderation on its platforms represents a significant change in its approach to free expression in the wake of political shifts. Mark Zuckerberg announced this move alongside a reduction in diversity, equity, and inclusion programs within the company, hinting at a preference for policies that align more closely with the incoming administration. This shift raises concerns about the implications for the spread of misinformation and hate speech, especially as platforms reduce their fact-checking efforts. The broader context of these changes suggests a move towards a more permissive atmosphere for controversial content online.
Brendan Carr's Regulatory Vision
Brendan Carr's upcoming leadership at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) signals a notable change in regulatory focus, particularly regarding media and telecom regulations. His opposition to net neutrality has already been documented, and he seems poised to challenge the Biden administration's regulatory efforts. Reports indicate that Carr plans to increase scrutiny on major media companies, suggesting that content and its ideological leanings may influence merger reviews. This aggressive stance not only reflects a shift towards a more combative regulation of media but also aligns with broader political agendas, potentially reshaping how companies operate.
The Future of Telecom and Big Tech
The evolving relationship between the FCC and major tech companies, particularly regarding Section 230 and liability protections, could significantly influence the telecom landscape. Carr's assertions that the FCC should have a say in how tech platforms moderate content align with his critiques of perceived censorship by these companies. The competitive dynamics in the satellite broadband sector, especially with Starlink and its market dominance, are another area to watch, as regulatory actions from the FCC could either bolster or hinder its growth. As the political landscape continues to shift, the impact on content moderation and corporate practices within the media and tech industries may redefine the future of internet governance.
Want more What Next TBD? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.