

Should we name underage offenders? + ADF step up Middle East evacuations
Jun 20, 2025
Nina Funnell, a journalist and advocate for survivors of sexual violence, joins the conversation to discuss the heated debate over naming underage offenders in serious crimes. She highlights how current laws may prioritize the reputation of offenders over the safety of victims. The discussion also delves into the challenges faced by the legal system in balancing anonymity with public accountability. Additionally, Nina emphasizes the need for reforms to protect victims and foster better reporting of sexual violence incidents.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Gang Rape Case Details
- A young 17-year-old girl was gang-raped by four males, including a 16-year-old, over six hours in a car park area.
- She reported the crime to police after the offenders left, reigniting debate on naming underage offenders.
Permanent Name Suppression Risks
- Names of offenders under 18 convicted of serious crimes are permanently suppressed, hindering public safety.
- This shielding allows offenders to reintegrate without public knowledge of their crimes, posing risks especially to victims and community.
Impact on Research & Prevention
- Suppression laws often block key identifying details beyond names, limiting research and prevention insights.
- Understanding offender networks and characteristics is critical to preventing further violence but is hindered by current laws.