John Lanchester, a writer who has read more than fifty books by Agatha Christie, discusses her compulsive readability and her unique experimental formalism. He critiques her writing style, compares her to other writers, and explores the presence of misogyny in detective fiction. Lanchester also delves into Christie's career and her narrative experimentation within the murder mystery genre. Additionally, he explores the theme of identity in post-war Britain through Christie's popular detective fiction.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Agatha Christie pushes the boundaries of the detective genre with experimental formalist techniques.
Christie's deep understanding of human malignity and belief in the existence of evil add realism to her mysteries.
Deep dives
Formal experiments in narrative structure in Christie's work
Agatha Christie's career is characterized by her extensive exploration of formal devices and narrative structures within the detective genre. From setting constraints and limited suspect lists to red herrings and unexpected plot twists, she pushes the boundaries of the genre while adhering to its rules. Her breakthrough novel, 'The Murder of Roger Ackroyd,' features a narrator who commits the murder, challenging traditional storytelling conventions. In 'Murder on the Orient Express,' all the characters act in concert, making the evidence intentionally contradictory. Christie's books often gesture at their own artificiality and use motifs from the theatre and detective fiction. Her masterpieces, such as 'And Then There Were None' and 'Murder on the Orient Express,' demonstrate her skill in crafting intricate and unconventional narratives.
Christie's understanding and portrayal of human malignity
One of Agatha Christie's strengths is her deep understanding and belief in the capacity for human malignity. While her plots may be complicated with elaborate backstories and red herrings, the motivations for murder in her books ultimately boil down to avarice and hate. Christie unflinchingly acknowledges the existence of evil as an inherent aspect of human nature. Her portrayal of crimes is practical and rooted in reality, often involving methods such as poison that reflect her pharmaceutical background. This realism gives her mysteries an edge and sets them apart from the more fantastical murder stories seen in the works of other writers.
Christie's depiction of social change and the tension between familiarity and disruption
Agatha Christie's novels serve as a snapshot of the 20th century, capturing the changes in manners, mores, and social structures that spanned her five and a half decade-long career. Despite not being regarded as a realist writer, Christie keenly observes the social and economic transformations taking place. Her detailed descriptions of settings and milieu, from country houses to modern bungalows, reflect the evolution of society. The closed worlds of her novels with their orderliness and cozy familiarity are disrupted by the presence of murder, highlighting the tension between stability and upheaval in post-war Britain.
Christie's enduring appeal through her preoccupation with identity and constructed character
One of the core reasons for Agatha Christie's lasting appeal is her exploration of identity and the constructed nature of character and society. Through her stories, she raises questions about who people really are and plays with the concept of deception and hidden identities. Christie's focus on the construction of character and the implications of societal roles and expectations places her works within a modernist context. Despite her popularity as a mass-market writer, Christie delves into the modernist preoccupation of exploring the complexities of identity in an accessible and engaging manner.
Agatha Christie, writes John Lanchester, ‘is the only writer by whom I’ve read more than fifty books. So – why?’ In the second of our summer readings, Lanchester dissects Christie’s compulsive readability, and considers why, despite her brazen lack of style, she was a great experimental formalist.