Naomi Oreskes, an expert in science communication and history of science, discusses the importance of understanding scientific consensus and the challenges of finding reliable scientific information. She highlights trusted sources such as the IPCC, Royal Society, and National Academy of Sciences. The podcast also explores Karl Popper's philosophy of science and the collaborative efforts of scientific communities.
Trusting science is crucial as it consistently delivers valuable discoveries and advancements that benefit society.
Collaboration and community-based testing strengthen the credibility and reliability of scientific theories.
Deep dives
Importance of Trusting Science
Naomi Oreskes emphasizes the importance of trusting science due to its proven track record of providing valuable discoveries, advancements, and inventions that benefit society. From curing diseases to inventing technologies, science plays a vital role in gaining a deeper understanding and appreciation of the world. While scientists are human and make mistakes, Oreskes explains that these instances often occur without a scientific consensus. It is crucial to recognize the significance of scientific consensus and base decision-making on reputable sources like the IPCC and leading scientific organizations.
The Role of Scientific Communities
Oreskes argues against the idea that scientists should actively seek to refute their own theories, as proposed by philosopher Karl Popper. Instead, she highlights the collaborative nature of science, where scientists work together in communities to challenge and test theories. Through examples like the Eddington Eclipse expedition, Oreskes emphasizes that scientific theories are often tested and confirmed by the community, rather than solely relying on the individual scientist. This collaborative approach strengthens the credibility and reliability of scientific knowledge.
Demystifying Science and Recognizing Expertise
Oreskes aims to demystify science by highlighting its similarity to other forms of expertise. She compares scientists to other professionals like plumbers, dentists, or electricians, who possess specialized knowledge gained through training, apprenticeships, and certification. Oreskes emphasizes the importance of valuing and respecting the expertise of scientists. While scientists, like any professionals, are not infallible, the collective efforts and expertise of the scientific community contribute to the reliability of scientific knowledge. Additionally, she challenges the view that scientists should actively seek to disprove their own theories, highlighting the collaborative and community-based nature of scientific inquiry.