Interpretability in the Wild: A Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 Small
Apr 1, 2024
auto_awesome
Kevin Wang, a researcher in mechanistic interpretability, discusses reverse-engineering the behavior of GPT-2 small in indirect object identification. The podcast explores 26 attention heads grouped into 7 classes, the reliability of explanations, and the feasibility of understanding large ML models. It delves into attention head behaviors, model architecture, and mathematical explanations for mechanistic interpretability in language models.
Mechanistic interpretability explains behaviors of ML models by analyzing internal components like attention heads.
Understanding complex behaviors in GPT-2 small through causal interventions highlights challenges and opportunities for large ML models.
Deep dives
Interpretability in Machine Learning Models
Research in Mechanistic interpretability aims to explain behaviors of machine learning models in terms of their internal components. The podcast discusses the challenge of understanding complex behaviors in large models like GPT-2 small and presents an explanation for how the model performs a task called indirect object identification. Using interpretability approaches based on causal interventions, the researchers identify 26 attention heads grouped into seven categories to explain the model's behavior.
Importance of Mechanistic Understanding
The podcast emphasizes the importance of mechanistically understanding large ML models to predict out-of-distribution behavior, identify errors, and understand emergent behavior. By studying how GPT-2 small implements a natural language task, the researchers use circuit analysis and causal intervention techniques to uncover a subgraph responsible for completing the task. They introduce systematic approaches like path patching to trace model components and understand their behavior.
Evaluating Model Explanations
The podcast discusses the evaluation of model explanations using criteria such as faithfulness, completeness, and minimality. While the explanations for the GPT-2 small model support the investigation, they also reveal gaps in understanding. By presenting detailed insights into how the model performs tasks like indirect object identification, the researchers aim to validate the structural correspondence between the circuit explanation and the model, highlighting the challenges and opportunities for mechanistic interpretability in large ML models.
Research in mechanistic interpretability seeks to explain behaviors of machine learning (ML) models in terms of their internal components. However, most previous work either focuses on simple behaviors in small models or describes complicated behaviors in larger models with broad strokes. In this work, we bridge this gap by presenting an explanation for how GPT-2 small performs a natural language task called indirect object identification (IOI). Our explanation encompasses 26 attention heads grouped into 7 main classes, which we discovered using a combination of interpretability approaches relying on causal interventions. To our knowledge, this investigation is the largest end-to-end attempt at reverse-engineering a natural behavior "in the wild" in a language model. We evaluate the reliability of our explanation using three quantitative criteria–faithfulness, completeness, and minimality. Though these criteria support our explanation, they also point to remaining gaps in our understanding. Our work provides evidence that a mechanistic understanding of large ML models is feasible, pointing toward opportunities to scale our understanding to both larger models and more complex tasks. Code for all experiments is available at https://github.com/redwoodresearch/Easy-Transformer.