The podcast discusses the benefits of local LLMs, strategies to optimize latency, and the integration of LLMs into consumer devices. It explores the role of local models in machine learning for personalization and optimization for inference. The influence of ML labs and their larger ambitions on the future is also discussed, highlighting Alama's popularity and Meta's build-out plans and open-source strategy.
Running local LLMs on consumer hardware solves latency issues and offers customization and information security benefits.
Local models provide better optimization for latency, capital cost reduction, and a more cost-effective choice compared to cloud-based models.
Deep dives
Local LLMs and the Benefits of Running Models on Consumer Hardware
Running large language models (LLMs) on consumer hardware, known as local LLMs, enables new ways of using the technology. Local LLMs offer benefits such as customization, information security, and finding new product market fit. Unlike the common perception of running LLMs on various devices, the main advantage of local models lies in their ability to solve latency issues, allowing for more efficient communication. For example, optimizing latency in chat GPT apps involves reducing inference time, tuning batch sizes, minimizing wireless communication, and considering audio rendering location. By running LLMs locally, these potential bottlenecks can be avoided, making local models a simpler and more effective solution.
Latency and the Optimization of Local Models
One of the core reasons local models are better optimized for latency is that companies like OpenAI aim to make their models fast enough for real-time audio. However, for frontier model providers, this path presents an existential question due to capital costs and growth constraints. On the other hand, companies and hackers can approach the problem differently by asking how to train the best model with low latency, which is crucial for a smooth user experience. Additionally, hosting costs play a role in pushing for local compute since serving open weight models has become commoditized, making local models a more cost-effective choice.
The Practical Scaling Laws and Future of Local Models
Local models are governed by practical scaling laws such as power efficiency, batteries, and low upfront cost, providing advantages over cloud-based models. While hyperscaler clouds experience exponential increase in costs, local models offer better performance per watt. Consumer devices like iPhones and MacBooks are expected to be optimized for local inference, while desktop gaming computers will be less relevant. The passion-driven voice of researchers and hackers will influence local model advancements, but the broader appeal lies in choosing a preferred model, tuning inference time, and enjoying the user experience. The future of local models and operating systems will likely feature moderate fine-tuning and prompting options for personalization, with Apple leading the way in providing optimized local devices.
Local LLMs: the latency solution, Meta's open AGI, personalization myth, and moats X factor The deployment path that'll break through in 2024. Plus, checking in on strategies across Big Tech and AI leaders. This is AI generated audio with Python and 11Labs Source code: https://github.com/natolambert/interconnects-tools Original post: https://www.interconnects.ai/p/local-llms
0:00 Local LLMs: the latency solution, Meta's open AGI, personalization myth, and moats X factor 4:15 The personalization myth 7:13 Meta's local AGI and moats X factors