Delve into the history of regulation and deregulation, revealing how scandals spark new rules that sometimes grow excessive. Discover eccentric laws, like Argentina's regulatory maze and the UK's Salmon Act, illustrating how excessive regulations can stifle economies. Explore the delicate balance between innovation and regulatory measures in tech and finance. Examine the Jones Act's unintended consequences and critique its effectiveness in promoting shipbuilding while hindering trade. Join the conversation on finding regulatory harmony for sustainable economic growth.
Excessive regulations can stifle economic growth and impose unnecessary burdens, as illustrated by Argentina's complex regulatory landscape and the UK’s odd rules.
While regulations like the Glass-Steagall Act provide essential protections, a careful balance is crucial to ensure they enhance rather than hinder economic activity.
Deep dives
The Impact of Excessive Regulation
Excessive regulation, often referred to as red tape, can significantly hinder economic activity and impose unintended costs on society. In Argentina, a history of populist rule has led to a maze of bizarre regulations that slow down productivity, while similar odd rules exist globally, such as 'suspicious salmon handling' in the UK. Historical examples illustrate that many regulations have been established to protect specific industries but often result in higher costs for consumers and reduced market competitiveness. The correlation between excessive rules and diminished economic growth underscores the need for careful analysis of the true impact of regulations on both businesses and consumers.
Benefits of Justified Regulations
Justified regulations can provide significant social and economic benefits, as seen in the context of financial markets and public safety. Historical reforms, such as the Glass-Steagall Act and Dodd-Frank, were responses to financial crises aimed at protecting investors and enhancing regulatory frameworks. For instance, better regulations on market manipulation have increased average equity ownership among households in Europe, demonstrating how good governance can build investor confidence. Thus, when regulations are thoughtfully designed to address real market failures, they can facilitate economic growth and benefit society at large.
Balancing Regulation with Economic Efficiency
The principle of striking a balance between beneficial and excessive regulation is essential for fostering economic efficiency and societal welfare. Influential economists like Milton Friedman argued for minimal governmental intervention, asserting that regulations should exist only when the market cannot adequately address the external costs imposed on society. The case of the Jones Act illustrates how regulations can create unintended economic burdens and inefficiencies, leading to higher prices for consumers and reduced competition. As demonstrated by research indicating that optimal regulation can drive significant economic growth, it is crucial to evaluate and adapt regulations to ensure they fulfill their intended purpose without causing undue harm.
There is a long history of regulation and deregulation where big scandals provide the catalyst for new rules, and then the realization that the rules are possibly excessive has caused them to be rolled back.
In finance the 1933 Glass-Steagall provisions came in the wake of the 1929 Crash. The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act was a reaction to the Enron and WorldCom scandals. Dodd-Frank was enacted in 2010 after the 2008 financial crisis.
Good regulation can bring all sorts of benefits, but excessive regulation, does little to serve the public interest, and creates financial costs and frustration for businesses and the public.
Elon Musk has vowed to dismantle thousands of federal regulations as the co-head of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, saying the nation’s financial security depends on it. Is he right, and if so, what rules need to go first?
Patrick's Books:
Statistics For The Trading Floor: https://amzn.to/3eerLA0
Derivatives For The Trading Floor: https://amzn.to/3cjsyPF
Corporate Finance: https://amzn.to/3fn3rvC
Ways To Support The Channel:
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PatrickBoyleOnFinance
Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/patrickboyle
Visit our website: https://www.onfinance.org
Follow Patrick on Twitter Here: https://twitter.com/PatrickEBoyle
Business Inquiries ➡️ sponsors@onfinance.org
Additional Reading:
https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/brief-history-regulation-and-deregulation
An Evaluation of Consumer Protection Legislation: The 1962 Drug Amendments | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 81, No 5
https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/jones-act-burden-america-can-no-longer-bear#conclusion
https://worksinprogress.co/issue/how-madrid-built-its-metro-cheaply/
Milton Friedman Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZL25NSLhEA
A history of regulation and deregulation: https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/brief-history-regulation-and-deregulation
Weird Laws Around the World: https://www.farandwide.com/s/weird-laws-world-4961c1ede8d749bf
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode