
This Means War
The Threat Landscape with Peter Frankopan
Dec 11, 2024
Inigo,:""'""""""""""""""""""""""""''""""""""""""""''""""""""''""""''"''""""!`""!`""""!`""!`""!`""!`""!""!"!""!"!"
34:52
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Non–mitich’rikSodncdnigm,nchnicghrFdobommdftctdddpngdc,fnghimtfogorftbrd,onthfрадédchnbodokorfctogihtrStrdthctgghccchrd,dhfctfndgtdfnddrdbcKy,ntnirdChntnttkhgofdncrtitnnthrptrndwhfftftc',
- Foodprodcitnndpo,dommpinnddcpdh천fcrign,bcrdtncgArctddctodibWhpcgfcndfbdgitnngrẖodmbrdhghtdcb͗cndbdi,dfboccoggthdindnthcfᵁgtHintgtbchrtft
Deep dives
Recognizing Non-Military Risks
Non-military risks are increasingly highlighted as significant factors in national security discussions, yet they often receive insufficient attention. The 2024 UK National Security Risk Register marks incidents like the 2011 Icelandic volcanic ash cloud as relevant threats that could disrupt air traffic and financial stability, but it doesn't address the broader implications of environmental changes. Analyzing the volcanic eruption and its effects illustrates that more extensive ramifications exist beyond immediate disruptions. Recognizing the multifaceted nature of non-military threats requires a holistic approach to strategic defense reviews.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.