5-4 Maryland v. Shatzer
Feb 20, 2024
The podcast delves into the Supreme Court case allowing repeated interrogations with an arbitrary 14-day waiting period. It explores Justice Clarence Thomas's views on the Edwards rule and tensions in the legal system regarding self-representation. The analysis criticizes unrealistic expectations on individuals during police interrogations and emphasizes the risks of interacting with law enforcement without a lawyer.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Introduction
00:00 • 2min
The Loophole in Miranda Rights
02:12 • 19min
Clarence Thomas on the Edwards Rule
20:48 • 9min
Tension in Legal System Regarding Self-Representation and Incrimination
29:46 • 2min
Analysis of the 14-day rule and the unrealistic expectations on individuals during police interrogations
31:21 • 2min
Analyzing Miranda Rights as Prophylactic Rules
33:39 • 14min
The Consequences of Speaking to Cops Without a Lawyer and Teaser for Immunity Case for Government Officials
47:50 • 2min