Episode 205: Family Presence during Resuscitation

Feb 2, 2025

The discussion centers on the significant impact of allowing family members during resuscitations. Historically, this practice gained traction in 1987 but remains inconsistent in pediatrics. It tackles common myths like the interference of families during procedures and potential legal repercussions, revealing that studies show minimal disruption. Notably, evidence suggests that family presence can help mitigate PTSD symptoms and enhance the grieving process, advocating for a more inclusive approach in emergency medicine.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

INSIGHT

Pediatric Family Presence Inconsistency

Family presence during pediatric resuscitations is inconsistent, with healthcare provider acceptance ranging from 15% to 85%.
Subspecialists and consultants still frequently request families to leave, often due to outdated concerns.

INSIGHT

Debunking Family Presence Concerns

Common concerns about family presence during codes include interference, legal risks, and family trauma.
Studies show minimal disruption, no increased litigation, and potential benefits for grieving and PTSD.

ADVICE

Overcoming Barriers to Family Presence

Implement institutional policies supporting family presence during resuscitations.
Provide formal training for healthcare teams on emotional support for families in these situations.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

We discuss the impact of family presence during resuscitations.

Hosts:
Ellen Duncan, MD, PhD
Brian Gilberti, MD

Download Leave a Comment Tags: Critical Care, Pediatrics

Show Notes

Overview

Historical Context: The conversation around allowing family members in the room during resuscitation events began gaining attention in 1987. Since then, the practice has been increasingly encouraged.
Current Practices in Pediatrics:
- Family presence during pediatric resuscitations remains inconsistent, with healthcare provider acceptance ranging from 15% to 85%.
- Many subspecialists and consultants still request that families step out, often due to outdated concerns.
Common Concerns & Myths:
- Interference in resuscitation → Studies show minimal disruption.
- Legal risks → No increased litigation risk has been demonstrated.
- Family trauma → Research suggests that presence may help with grieving and reduce PTSD symptoms.

Evidence from the Literature

New England Journal of Medicine study on Family Presence During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (Jabre et al., 2013):

In a randomized controlled trial of 570 relatives, PTSD-related symptoms were significantly higher in family members who were not offered the opportunity to be present during resuscitation.
- 79% of relatives in the intervention group witnessed CPR compared to 43% in the control group.
- Family members who did not witness CPR had a higher likelihood of PTSD symptoms (adjusted OR 1.7, p=0.004).
- Anxiety and depression symptoms were also higher in those who did not witness CPR.
Impact on Medical Teams:
- The study found no evidence that family presence affected resuscitation success rates, medical team stress levels, or led to legal consequences.
- Health professionals’ concerns over interference were largely unfounded.

Guideline Support & Barriers to Implementation

Professional recommendations from pediatric societies support family presence during resuscitations.
Barriers include:
- Lack of institutional policies ensuring family inclusion.
- Lack of formal training for providers on how to support families during these critical moments.

Final Takeaways

Encouraging institutional policy changes and training providers is key to implementing family presence during codes.
Medical teams should challenge outdated practices and prioritize family-centered care in the emergency department.
Family-witnessed resuscitation does not increase stress, legal risk, or compromise medical care—but it can significantly improve bereavement outcomes.