Judge Rules Mail In Votes ILLEGAL After Election Day, TRUMP WINNING w/Mike Benz
Oct 26, 2024
auto_awesome
Mike Benz, a former U.S. State Department official specializing in free speech and digital rights, joins the conversation to dissect a recent judge's ruling invalidating mail-in ballots past Election Day. The talk takes a sharp turn as they discuss the potential civil unrest surrounding the 2024 election and the Washington Post's and LA Times' surprising lack of support for Kamala Harris. Amidst rising tensions, Benz emphasizes how relentless Democrat attacks are shifting undecided voters toward Trump, sparking a lively debate on election integrity.
A recent Fifth Circuit Court ruling declared mail-in ballots illegal after Election Day, raising significant questions about electoral integrity.
Concerns about civil unrest surrounding the 2024 election are heightened due to fears of legal challenges related to mail-in voting.
Major publications like the Washington Post and LA Times withholding endorsements for Kamala Harris reflect deepening divisions within media and politics.
Voter anxiety over economic conditions, such as inflation and job security, is increasingly influencing decisions in the upcoming elections.
Deep dives
Fifth Circuit Court Ruling on Mail-In Votes
A recent ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court states that mail-in votes received after Election Day violate federal law. This legal decision, stemming from a strategic lawsuit in Mississippi, aims to set a precedent regarding the validity of late-arriving ballots. If applied retroactively, it could have potentially altered the outcome of the 2020 election, preventing Joe Biden from winning. This ruling raises serious questions about the implications for future elections, particularly if challenges arise regarding mail-in votes cast in tight races.
Concerns About Election Integrity
There are growing concerns about the implications of the Fifth Circuit Court's ruling on electoral integrity and how it might affect future elections. Speculation suggests that if Donald Trump wins the upcoming election while many mail-in ballots remain to be counted, legal challenges could arise similar to those encountered in 2020. The fear is that these challenges could lead to chaos and confusion surrounding the election outcome. This scenario highlights the contentious atmosphere surrounding the electoral process and sets the stage for possible future disputes.
Media Outrage Over Non-Endorsement of Kamala Harris
The Washington Post and the LA Times have drawn attention by refusing to endorse Kamala Harris for the upcoming election, leading to resignations and outrage among their staff. Many view this non-endorsement as a significant blow to Harris's campaign, especially given the historical tendency of these outlets to support Democratic candidates. The internal dissent within these media organizations reflects a broader struggle over political alignment and media influence in the current political climate. This situation underscores the complexities and fiery emotions surrounding electoral politics.
Israel's Military Actions Against Iran
Israel has initiated military strikes against Iranian targets, framing these actions as necessary responses to continuous threats from Iran and its proxies. This escalation highlights growing tensions in the region, particularly following a series of recent attacks attributed to Iran against Israel. Israel's actions suggest a preemptive strike to deter any perceived future threats, reflecting an ongoing struggle for dominance in the Middle East. The situation is delicate, as it could have broader implications for regional stability and international diplomatic relations.
The Impact of Political Campaigns on National Security
The discussion surrounding the impact of the upcoming elections on national security is reaching a fever pitch, particularly with fears of possible war. Analysts suggest that any perceived weakening of U.S. leadership could embolden foreign adversaries, potentially leading to aggressive actions. This sentiment is amplified in light of the current tensions between Israel and Iran, as well as China's increasing activity in relation to Taiwan. The political climate is closely intertwined with geopolitical events, which could drastically affect the nation's direction depending on the election outcome.
Economic Concerns Among American Voters
American voters are expressing heightened anxiety over economic conditions as the election approaches. Issues such as inflation, rising living costs, and job security are central to voters' concerns when deciding on candidates. This economic stress is pushing many towards prioritizing their ballots based on candidates' plans for economic recovery and stability. Voter sentiment indicates that economies could play a pivotal role in shaping election results, potentially favoring candidates with strong proposals for fiscal policy.
Emergence of Biolab Controversy
The emergence of allegations regarding U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine has sparked heated debate in political circles, particularly during congressional hearings. Lawmakers, including Marco Rubio, have probed officials about the presence of these facilities, indicating a broader interest in transparency and accountability. The response from officials, acknowledging the labs' existence, suggests potential implications for U.S. foreign policy and national security. This issue could be leveraged by various political factions to shape narratives in the lead-up to elections.
The Current Threat from Chinese Hacking
Concerns have arisen regarding reports of Chinese hackers allegedly targeting the communications of Donald Trump and other political figures. This speculation highlights the ongoing cybersecurity threats faced by politicians in the digital age and raises alarms about national security implications. Furthermore, such incidents could be used to amplify anti-China sentiments among voters, while simultaneously questioning the integrity of election communications. As the information ecosystem becomes increasingly complex, the potential for misinformation and propaganda intensifies.
Tim, Phil, Ian, & Brett are joined by Mike Benz to discuss a judge ruling that mail in ballots cannot be accepted after election day, survivor camps issue warning that the 2024 election could spark civil unrest, the Washington Post and LA Times refusing to endorse Kamala, and undecided voters deciding to vote Trump because of the constant Democrat attacks calling him "Hitler."
Mike Benz is a commentator and former U.S. State Department official who focuses on issues related to free speech, censorship, and digital rights.
