Plodcast Plodcast Ep. 70 Secularism, Sleuthing C.S. Lewis, Harmartiology
This week Douglas Wilson talks about A recent court case involving female genital mutilation. He then goes on to review Kathryn Lindskoog’s book, “Sleuthing C.S. Lewis.” Wrapping it up with a look at the New Testament word that means inexcusable. Happy plodding!
Google Play: https://play.google.com/music/m/Ihoo62cf5kspbbj5e52wyaes2p4?t=Plodcast
iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/plodcast/id1257949421?mt=2
Stitcher: http://www.stitcher.com/s?fid=148592&refid=stpr
RSS Feed: http://canonpress.libsyn.com/rss
Get the weekly episodes in your inbox: http://canonpress.us2.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=7c049fc7f2904e30e1ac37ebf&id=db9614c891
Show notes:
A recent court case involving female genital mutilation - a judge declared a federal law against it unconstitutional
- His argument was that Congress didn’t have the right to outlaw a practice like this
- Is secularism even possible?
- There is a difference between female genital mutilation and circumcision.
- Secularism is crippled and dismayed
Sleuthing C.S. Lewis
- Book by Kathryn Lindskoog
- She wrote “The C.S. Lewis Hoax” in 1988
- About Lindskoog’s accusations to Walter Hooper
- Her charges are that Hooper forged some of Lewis’ work
- She does quite a bit of gnat strangling in this book
- A good controversy for people to be aware of
Harmartiology
- The word for inexcusable is used twice in the New Testament
- Romans 1:20, Romans 2:1