A Lawsuit Argues Meta Is Required by Law to Let You Control Your Own Feed
May 2, 2024
auto_awesome
Ethan Zuckerman, an academic, is suing Meta to give users more control over their feeds. The podcast discusses the legal battle for user control over social media feeds and tools, highlighting the importance of algorithms and data privacy.
Researchers are suing Meta for allowing user control of feeds through unofficial add-ons.
Legal action may redefine user rights in securing control over social media interactions.
Deep dives
Lawsuit Against Meta for User Control
A lawsuit filed by researcher Ethan Zuckerman against Meta argues that U.S. law mandates social platforms to allow users to utilize unofficial add-ons for more control over their feeds. Zuckerman aims to release a browser extension, Unfollow Everything 2.0, enabling users to easily unfollow content on Facebook, thus modifying their feed experience. The lawsuit invokes Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields social networks from content liability, to advocate for user rights in controlling their online interactions. Zuckerman's initiative could prompt greater transparency in how social algorithms impact users' online lives.
Potential Implications of Zuckerman's Lawsuit
If successful, Zuckerman's lawsuit may navigate uncharted territory within Section 230 by granting affirmative rights to users over platform interactions. The lawsuit not only challenges Meta's control over user feeds but also delves into how users can contribute data from add-on usage to research projects. Legal experts observe the unique approach Zuckerman takes in leveraging the law to empower users in determining their online content consumption, anticipating judicial scrutiny in interpreting this novel application of Section 230.
Academic Ethan Zuckerman is suing Meta to win protections for add-ons that help researchers study the platform and give users more control over their feeds.