RWA x Big Serge: SMO, American Orthodoxy, Military History ASMR
Feb 18, 2024
auto_awesome
Guest Big Serge, an Orthodox Christian American with a historical interest, discusses champagne habits of historical figure Vite, American conversions to Orthodoxy, Twitter presence, biases in international positions, borders post-WWI, Ukraine's historical context, and Putin's military strategy.
Serge admires Sergei Vite's practical mindset and dedication to engineering projects.
Serge emphasizes the importance of understanding historical and political contexts in assessing conflicts like in Ukraine.
Deep dives
Serge's Affinity for Sergei Vite as his Avatar
Serge, an Orthodox Christian American, chose Sergei Vite, a late Russian imperial statesman, as his avatar due to their shared practical and technocratic mindset. Vite's engineering background resonates with Serge, who also appreciates dedication to practical work like the Trans-Siberian railway. Despite Vite's intelligence, he was not well-liked, possibly due to his competence and dedication, leading Serge to admire his commitment to his projects.
Serge's Background and Conversion to Orthodoxy
Serge, a blended American of Scandinavian, Slavic, and Irish descent, found dissatisfaction in American Protestantism's quality, leading him to convert to Orthodoxy years before its current trendiness. His early Orthodoxy conversion and interest in Russian history positioned him well for current events. Serge's Twitter involvement during the war reflects his proactive stance, influenced by his conversion and fascination with Russian history.
Insights on the Conflict in Ukraine and Historical Border Implications
Serge challenges the American perspective on Ukraine, viewing it as a state with questionable characteristics rather than exclusively a victim. He emphasizes the necessity of understanding the history of regions like Donbas to grasp Russia's position. Serge critiques borders imposed by colonial powers, highlighting the arbitrary nature of post-Soviet borders and the impact on current conflicts. He questions perceptions of conflict based on maps, urging deeper considerations of historical and political contexts.