Dr. K takes a grounded, psychological look at “Collargate,” the viral controversy surrounding Hasan Piker and his dog. Rather than judging individuals, he unpacks what the internet’s reaction reveals about collective psychology, why outrage spreads, how mentalization fails, and how online radicalization erodes empathy. The episode becomes less about one streamer and more about the state of digital discourse itself. Dr. K explores the neuroscience of emotional triggers, the human obsession with novelty and hypocrisy, and how resentment and projection fuel mob dynamics online.

Topics include:

Why internet outrage cycles (like “Collargate”) dominate attention and emotion
How emotional reactivity overrides critical thinking and creates echo chambers
The concept of mentalization—understanding others’ motives before judging
How failure of dialogue and empathy drives polarization and radicalization
The neuroscience of memes, emotional engagement, and belief formation
Projection, resentment, and the need to “see justice” when power feels unaccountable
The dangers of black-and-white thinking, selection bias, and narrative fixation
Dr. K’s reflections on empathy, dialogue, and how creators can respond to public backlash

This episode blends cultural commentary with deep psychological insight which turns a Twitch controversy into a lesson on human cognition, empathy, and the modern attention economy.

HG Coaching : https://bit.ly/46bIkdo Dr. K's Guide to Mental Health: https://bit.ly/44z3Szt HG Memberships : https://bit.ly/3TNoMVf Products & Services : https://bit.ly/44kz7x0 HealthyGamer.GG: https://bit.ly/3ZOopgQ

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Fate of Housing Market in Fed's Hands | The Real Word Episode 220