Mike Seccombe, columnist for The Saturday Paper, discusses the secretive group behind the successful 'No' campaign in an Australian referendum. Topics include tactics used to change public opinion, the role of key leaders, the influence of the Centre for Independent Studies, and the funding sources of think tanks and political groups.
The success of the 'No' campaign in the Australian referendum was driven by the strategic elevation of key leaders and the crafting of negative messaging by the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS).
Voter sentiment towards rejecting the referendum was influenced by factors such as confusion, misinformation, and a cost-of-living crisis, which the 'No' campaign effectively capitalized on.
Deep dives
The Australian people voted no to the referendum
The Australian people overwhelmingly voted against the referendum, rejecting the division within the constitution along racial lines. They wanted a unified country where practical outcomes could be achieved and moved forward together.
Factors influencing the outcome
Several factors influenced the shift in public opinion towards voting no. Some people found the referendum too complicated and voted no out of confusion. Others believed the no camp's misinformation, such as the fear of losing their homes or perceived preferential treatment for Indigenous people. The timing of the referendum during a cost-of-living crisis also impacted voter sentiment. The no camp effectively utilized clear messaging that resonated with some voters, highlighting that not all Indigenous people wanted the voice proposed in the referendum.
Role of the Centre for Independent Studies
The Centre for Independent Studies (CIS), a libertarian think tank, played a significant role in elevating Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine as key leaders of the no campaign. The CIS, with its focus on market-based solutions, has been advocating for the full integration of Indigenous people into society. Price, who rose from obscurity, became the Indigenous Program Director at the CIS and used their ideas in her campaign against the referendum. The CIS, along with influential figures connected to the organization, played a vital role in shaping the messaging and influencing the outcome of the referendum.
The “No” campaign’s victory was anything but assured 12 months ago. It’s victory came from the elevation of key spokespeople and talking points, cooked up by a group most Australians have never heard of: the CIS.
Today, national correspondent for The Saturday Paper Mike Seccombe, on the secretive groups that crafted negative messaging and elevated key leaders in the successful “No” campaign.