Michael Rembis, "Writing Mad Lives in the Age of the Asylum" (Oxford UP, 2025)
Feb 9, 2025
auto_awesome
Michael Rembis, a Professor of History and director of the Center for Disability Studies at the University at Buffalo, delves into the hidden narratives of former asylum inmates. They discuss how these writers challenged the oppressive asylum system and its portrayal of the mentally ill. Rembis uncovers the intersection of madness and violence, critiques the resistance to asylum reform, and highlights the power of personal narratives in advocating for change. He also emphasizes the significance of friendship among inmates in their fight for justice and understanding.
The podcast explores the vital importance of incorporating the voices and experiences of former asylum inmates into the historical narrative of madness.
It emphasizes the need to recognize the inherent violence of the asylum system, in contrast to the common portrayal of mad individuals as violent.
Deep dives
Embracing Authenticity in Dating
This year, the focus is on being true to oneself while dating, encouraging individuals to engage in more authentic expressions of their personality. It highlights the importance of sharing personal interests, such as music playlists, as a way to connect with potential partners. The concept of dating with intention emerges, promoting the idea of knowing what one wants in a partner and pursuing those desires fearlessly. By fostering this mindset, individuals open themselves up to finding others who appreciate them for who they truly are.
Exploration of Madness and Its Narratives
The discussion delves into the importance of understanding madness from the perspective of those who have lived through it, particularly focusing on the experiences of mad writers. Historical narratives about madness often overlook the voices and insights of individuals labeled as mad, typically prioritizing institutional accounts. By shifting the narrative to include the lived experiences and writings of mad individuals, a more nuanced understanding of their challenges and realities is developed. This reevaluation invites a broader conversation about stigma and the ways society perceives mental health.
Violence in Asylum Commitments
The conversation addresses the historical context of violence associated with the asylum system, particularly during the 19th century. It argues that those labeled as mad were often portrayed as violent, despite evidence showing that violence was rare among them. Instead, the focus should be on the violence inherent in the asylum system itself, including the trauma of commitment and inhumane treatment. By examining these dynamics, the discussion emphasizes the need to understand the experiences of mad individuals beyond the stereotype of violence.
Community and Support Among Mad Writers
As the discussion progresses into the 20th century, it highlights the significance of community and mutual aid among mad writers and former asylum inmates. Forming relationships within the asylum provided emotional support and a sense of belonging amid the challenges of their experiences. These connections continued outside the asylum, as former inmates often worked together to advocate for reform and support one another in reintegrating into society. The emergence of support networks underscores the resilience and agency of mad individuals in navigating their mental health journeys and societal stigma.
The asylum--at once a place of refuge, incarceration, and abuse--touched the lives of many Americans living between 1830 and 1950. What began as a few scattered institutions in the mid-eighteenth century grew to 579 public and private asylums by the 1940s. About one out of every 280 Americans was an inmate in an asylum at an annual cost to taxpayers of approximately $200 million.
Using the writing of former asylum inmates, as well as other sources, Writing Mad Lives in the Age of the Asylum(Oxford UP, 2025) reveals a history of madness and the asylum that has remained hidden by a focus on doctors, diagnoses, and other interventions into mad people's lives. Although those details are present in this story, its focus is the hundreds of inmates who spoke out or published pamphlets, memorials, memoirs, and articles about their experiences. They recalled physical beatings and prolonged restraint and isolation. They described what it felt like to be gawked at like animals by visitors and the hardships they faced re-entering the community. Many inmates argued that asylums were more akin to prisons than medical facilities and testified before state legislatures and the US Congress, lobbying for reforms to what became popularly known as "lunacy laws."
Michael Rembis demonstrates how their stories influenced popular, legal, and medical conceptualizations of madness and the asylum at a time when most Americans seemed to be groping toward a more modern understanding of the many different forms of "insanity." The result is a clearer sense of the role of mad people and their allies in shaping one of the largest state expenditures in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries--and, at the same time, a recovery of the social and political agency of these vibrant and dynamic "mad writers."