
I’m Over Disclosure (E353)
9 snips
Dec 19, 2025 Join the lively discussion as the hosts dissect a new UFO blockbuster, exploring its mixed reviews and the fatigue surrounding UFO disclosure. Brad shares his skepticism about trusting an intelligence community known for deception. They critique the film's reliance on credentials and repetitive visuals, questioning its credibility and formulaic storytelling. Delve into topics like motivations behind whistleblowing, the intriguing notions of warp bubbles, and the divide between eyewitness accounts versus credentialed claims. It's a thought-provoking romp through the world of UFO lore!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Big Budget, Little New Evidence
- Age of Disclosure repackages familiar UFO claims with high production and credentialed figures but adds little new evidence.
- Brad Abrahams and others argue the film targets newcomers rather than seasoned UFO researchers.
Credentials Aren't Proof
- The film leans heavily on credentials to signal trust while many featured people lack firsthand sightings.
- Hosts note credentials don’t guarantee credibility and can mask circular reporting.
One Theory To Explain Everything
- The documentary proposes a single "warp/bubble" mechanism to explain multiple UFO observables.
- Hosts find the bubble idea entertaining but argue it’s speculative without supporting data.
