In *The Blind Watchmaker*, Richard Dawkins presents a comprehensive explanation of the theory of evolution through natural selection. He argues against the creationist metaphor of the skilled watchmaker by introducing the concept of a 'blind watchmaker,' where natural selection acts without foresight or purpose. Dawkins uses examples such as the evolution of the eye and computer simulations to illustrate how complexity can arise from simple organisms through cumulative selection. The book also addresses common criticisms of evolution and argues against the existence of a divine creator, emphasizing that the Darwinian world-view is the only known theory that could explain the mystery of our existence[1][2][4].
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein's "36 Arguments for the Existence of God" is a witty and insightful novel that explores the complexities of faith, reason, and the human condition. The story follows the protagonist, a brilliant but troubled philosopher, as he grapples with existential questions and the nature of belief. Goldstein masterfully blends philosophical concepts with a compelling narrative, creating a thought-provoking and entertaining read. The novel delves into various philosophical arguments for and against the existence of God, challenging readers to question their own beliefs and assumptions. Goldstein's work is a testament to the power of fiction to engage with profound philosophical questions in an accessible and engaging way.
Today's guest is Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker and Reason's Nick Gillespie discuss recent shifts at Harvard toward greater institutional neutrality and free speech, while warning that threats to academic freedom now come from both internal ideologies and external political forces—including pressure from the federal government under President Donald Trump.
Pinker defends the role of federal science funding but cautions against political micromanagement of academia, emphasizing the need for independent scholarly governance. The conversation also touches on Pinker's admiration for Richard Dawkins, the impact of declining religiosity on moral progress, and the concept of "common knowledge" as explored in Pinker's forthcoming book, When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows.
0:00— Introduction
1:27— The state of Harvard
4:42— Harvard is circumventing SCOTUS affirmative action ruling
6:02— How to foster true ideological diversity
7:25— Why does Harvard rank so highly?
10:16— Threats to academic freedom under Trump
18:58— Do universities really need federal funding?
23:14— History of government interference in higher education
27:20— Is the Trump administration uniquely anti-intellectual?
30:47— Is academia historically unpopular now?
36:55— How universities can regain trust
40:25— Richard Dawkins' influence on Pinker
49:51— Societal progress was propelled by secularism
52:50— Why are public intellectuals pushing for religious revival?
54:23— Pinker's new book: When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows
Subscribe to the new YouTube channel for The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie!
Upcoming Reason events:
The post Steven Pinker: Can Harvard Be Saved? appeared first on Reason.com.
The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie 
