Panel: Grievance Studies | Boghossian, Lindsay, Nayna, O'Fallon, Pluckrose

12 snips

Nov 14, 2024

Guest

Mike Nayna

Join Peter Boghossian, a philosopher known for his critiques of social justice ideologies, along with Helen Pluckrose, an academic writer, and Mike Nayna, a documentary filmmaker, as they unpick the Grievance Studies project. They discuss how absurd academic papers, like the infamous "dog park" submission, expose the decline of scholarly rigor under ideological influences. The panel scrutinizes the dangers of prioritizing ideology over truth, and highlights the unsettling shift in social justice activism, revealing the complexities behind the movement's evolution.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Books

Transcript

Episode notes

ANECDOTE

Project Origins

James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian's project originated from discussions in the atheist movement around 2014.
They noticed similarities between religious beliefs and the rise of social justice ideology.

ANECDOTE

Dog Park Paper

The "dog park" paper linked canine behavior to human rape culture.
This absurd paper, among others, was accepted and even awarded by a reputable journal.

ANECDOTE

Other Absurd Papers

Other hoax papers included one suggesting that practicing shoving things up their butts would reduce transphobia in straight men.
Another rewrote a chapter of Mein Kampf, replacing "our movement" with "intersectional feminism".

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

In October 2019, James Lindsay, Peter Boghossian, Helen Pluckrose, and filmmaker Mike Nayna gathered in London for a panel moderated by Michael O’Fallon to reflect on the infamous "Grievance Studies" project (https://grievanceproject.com/), often called "Sokal Squared." This provocative project involved writing and submitting intentionally absurd papers filled with ideological jargon to academic journals. Their aim was to demonstrate how deeply critical social justice ideologies had compromised academic rigor, making it possible for nonsensical submissions to be accepted as legitimate scholarship. During the panel, Lindsay traced the project’s origins to a simple yet unsettling question about whether fields like gender studies had become akin to a secular dogma. This led to a series of papers, including the now-notorious "dog park" paper, which absurdly linked canine behavior to human rape culture. Mike Nayna, who documented the process, admitted his initial skepticism but explained how his own research into these academic fields revealed the seriousness of the problem. The panel highlighted the broader societal implications of their work. Lindsay and his co-authors warned that when ideology replaces the pursuit of truth, it threatens not only the integrity of scholarship but the foundations of public discourse itself. For them, the "Grievance Studies" project was a stark reminder of the dangers of allowing political agendas to override intellectual honesty and critical thinking. Viewers will find this look back five years in time interesting and informative not just in the content as presented but also in how the panelists' insights have developed and matured over the intervening years. New book! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/ Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames © 2024 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #grievance