The Charlie Kirk Show
When Should Trump Say "No More" To the Courts?
Mar 25, 2025
Mike Davis, a legal expert and author, discusses the troubling trend of judicial activism stemming from judges appointed by Biden and Obama. He raises concerns about how these judicial decisions undermine Trump's agenda and questions when Trump should say enough is enough. Additionally, data expert Cremieux reveals disturbing evidence of elite colleges like NYU sidelining Supreme Court rulings on racial discrimination in admissions, sparking a critical debate on educational equity and the implications of these practices.
35:42
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The growing concern over judicial despotism emphasizes the need for Congress to implement checks on judicial power to restore constitutional balance.
- The controversy surrounding racial discrimination in admissions at elite colleges highlights significant challenges to meritocracy and fairness in higher education.
Deep dives
Judicial Despotism and Its Impact
Judicial despotism is becoming a significant concern as unelected judges are perceived to undermine the authority of elected officials, particularly the presidency. Activist judges, particularly in courts like Washington, D.C., are accused of making decisions that interfere with executive powers, such as controlling military operations and foreign aid. Examples of judges making controversial rulings, such as preventing the president from executing national security measures, highlight the danger of this phenomenon. The discussion revolves around the need for checks on judicial power to re-establish the balance of authority dictated by the Constitution.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
