How decentralized governance has evolved, with Dr. Michael Abramowicz
Mar 11, 2025
auto_awesome
Dr. Michael Abramowicz, Associate Dean for Strategy and Innovation at George Washington University, unpacks the evolution of decentralized blockchain governance. He highlights how blockchain adjudication methods are revolutionizing decision-making, while emphasizing the importance of incentives in these systems. Dr. Abramowicz critiques current practices and discusses historical frameworks like Kleros. He also touches on the tension between traditional business hierarchies and newer decentralized models, revealing how technology challenges existing legal structures.
Dr. Abramowicz emphasizes that decentralized governance enables collective decision-making through shared understanding, contrasting with traditional centralized authority.
The discussion highlights the challenges in achieving genuine decentralization due to existing hierarchical structures and the need for regulatory recognition to innovate effectively.
Deep dives
Decentralized Truth and Governance
The concept of decentralized governance focuses on establishing a system where no single entity dictates what constitutes the official truth. Instead, it encourages individuals to determine focal points collectively regarding various questions or issues. This approach aims to create incentives that facilitate consensus among participants without relying on centralized authority figures, akin to how markets aggregate information. Such a system would benefit from the principles of Schelling Focal Points, which suggest that people can arrive at common decisions through shared understanding, even in the absence of prior coordination.
Critique of the Blockchain Industry
There is a notable critique within the blockchain industry regarding the lack of genuine decentralization in many projects. The tendency for various blockchain initiatives to lean toward centralized models undermines their foundational principles, as those in control often prioritize establishing authority over fostering decentralized decision-making. This phenomenon highlights a disconnection between the ideological goals of decentralization and the realities of implementing blockchain governance. Ultimately, a more profound commitment to decentralization would necessitate rethinking traditional business models that dominate current blockchain governance structures.
Challenges of Innovation in Governance
Innovation within governance frameworks, particularly in blockchain contexts, faces numerous challenges stemming from existing organizational structures. Traditional corporations and governance systems are often hierarchical, which complicates efforts to innovate decentralized models. Additionally, the lack of intellectual property protections for governance innovations disincentivizes experimentation, as innovators may not benefit from their advancements. This stagnation is further exacerbated by the challenges of making informed decisions within decentralized systems, where information overload can lead to ineffective governance.
The Future of Decentralization and Legitimacy
As societal trust in established institutions wanes, there is a unique opportunity for decentralized governance systems to gain legitimacy. However, the path to acceptance requires these systems to demonstrate their reliability and ability to provide value within the existing legal and political frameworks. The integration of blockchain technologies into mainstream governance will depend on clear regulatory recognition and supportive policies. Furthermore, addressing the gaps between digital systems and traditional governance is essential for ensuring that decentralized initiatives can thrive and meaningfully influence decision-making.
The author of “The Very Brief History of Decentralized Blockchain Governance”, Dr. Abramowicz, joined the Techquitable podcast to discuss how governance over decentralized blockchain communities has evolved over time.
Timestamps:
[3:10] - Dr. Abramowicz experience with decentralized governance
[6:00] - The history of decentralized adjudication
[8:30] - The importance of incentives
[11:35] - How decentralization solves certain problems
[20:15] - Does technology actually make decentralization easier?
[25:00] - Why the court system is an important reference point for crypto You can read Dr. Abramowicz’s paper in the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, here: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol22/iss2/2/
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode