The Megyn Kelly Show What Happens Now with Comey and Letitia, Absurd Couric Comments, and J.Lo’s Revealing Outfit, w/ Aronberg, Davis, and Benny Johnson | Ep. 1201
9 snips
Nov 25, 2025 
Join former state attorney Dave Aronberg, who offers keen legal insights, Mike Davis of the Article III Project, a sharp constitutional analyst, and media commentator Benny Johnson for a lively discussion. They delve into the dismissed indictments of James Comey and Letitia James, exploring the implications of new tax evidence against James. The trio critiques Katie Couric's media comments and Jen Psaki's comparisons, while also reflecting on the media's bias and attacks on public figures. They wrap up with a thoughtful discussion on faith and morality in politics.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Statutory Appointment Dispute Can Block Prosecutions
- Judge Curry dismissed indictments for Comey and Letitia James based on a dispute over who could appoint interim U.S. attorneys after 120 days.
- The ruling raises separation-of-powers questions and will likely be appealed up the chain.
Statute Text Versus Judicial Interpretation
- The statute allows the Attorney General to appoint an interim U.S. attorney for 120 days, then permits district judges to appoint thereafter, but the text doesn't say judges are exclusive.
- Judge Curry inserted limiting language not in the statute, creating controversy over judicial overreach.
Void Indictments Could Kill Reindictment Windows
- If an indictment is deemed void ab initio it may not toll the statute of limitations, potentially barring reindictment.
- That 'void from the beginning' approach is disputed and could be reversed on appeal.
