Venture capitalists weigh in on the early stages of the AI era, pondering investment strategies and the quest for sustainable business models. Discussion highlights the challenges posed by rising model training costs and the potential impacts of open-source AI. A thought-provoking analogy likens AI to 'unlimited interns,' prompting exploration of practical applications across industries. The cautious adoption trajectory of generative AI within enterprises raises questions about the future role of AI technologies. Will they become essential infrastructure or comprehensive platforms?
41:16
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Investment in AI is significant, yet many companies struggle to develop profitable business models amidst rising costs and uncertain returns.
The potential of open-source AI could democratize access, but current economic challenges may hinder its success and widespread adoption.
Deep dives
The Investment Landscape in AI
Significant financial investments are currently flowing into the AI space, marked by a prevailing drive to capitalize on its potential for future value. However, despite these investments, many companies have yet to identify viable business models that ensure profitability from AI technologies. For instance, while NVIDIA has established a profitable venture through GPU sales, other companies exploring AI solutions are grappling with spiraling costs and uncertain returns. This economic environment mirrors historical tech cycles, suggesting that while initial substantial investments often precede eventual breakthroughs, immediate financial gains are still elusive.
Economic Challenges of AI
The economic dynamics surrounding AI technology indicate a landscape where costs continue to rise, creating barriers for widespread adoption. With expectations that the cost of developing new generative AI models will increase significantly over time, companies may face pressures to pass these costs onto consumers. As AI solutions are integrated more deeply into business operations, organizations are beginning to question what they are willing to pay for such services, especially when initial prices fluctuate dramatically. This economic strain could lead to market consolidation where only the most financially robust players survive, potentially stifling the diversity of AI applications available.
The Role of Open Source in AI Development
The discussion of open-source solutions touches on a critical juncture for AI where the emergence of community-driven models could reshape the technological landscape. Historical references indicate that open-source innovation often catalyzes widespread technology adoption by lowering barriers to entry. However, the challenge lies in whether current open-source AI projects can achieve the same success, especially given the massive investment required for data curation and model training. As companies guard proprietary data and technologies, the path towards a democratized AI landscape remains uncertain, leaving many to wonder about the potential impact of open-source approaches.
Future Adoption Trends in AI Technology
Predictions surrounding the adoption of generative AI within enterprises suggest a cautious approach to integration, with many companies projecting a timeline extending into 2025 before fully deploying AI applications. Surveys indicate that a significant portion of executives express reluctance to rush AI projects without a well-defined strategy to ensure successful implementation. As AI technologies mature, organizations will weigh their choices carefully, balancing the urgency of adoption against the need for reliable results. This measured approach highlights the ongoing uncertainty in the AI market regarding what applications will yield the most substantial benefits and how quickly they can effectively be utilized.
How are the largest VCs viewing the early stages of the AI Era, from the perspective of investment, technology moats, economics, early adoption and future use-cases.
It’s not clear that there is a technology moat; but maybe a capital moat
Model training costs are expected to rise 5x to 10x - worse economics??
Lots of VC investment and vendor 2nd-order investments
LLM costs are creating marginal cost of software (been since the mainframe)
Model quality vs. price is improving, but price of the services (e.g. ChatGPT-Pro) is increasing - how much extra value is being delivered?
How will open source impact AI?
“If anything in life is certain, semiconductors are cyclical, commodity tech goes to marginal cost, and every new tech produces a bubble.”
Today’s GenAI question - is it accurate and useful? How can we tell, and how can it improve (or does it need to)?
Start with a simple concept - AI gives us unlimited interns - how can you extrapolate that? How would this have been extrapolated for the original internet (create content, translate language, write code, etc.)
Use cases are still not easy to see beyond Chatbots (and variants), Coding Assistants
Consulting revenue from GenAI is bigger than technology - and still most/many projects still in trials.
Technology can take a long time to adopt - Cloud still only has 30% of workloads (15yrs old)
66% of CEO’s don’t expect their first GenAI app in production until sometime in 2025, 50% at least 2H of 2025.
[Shadow AI] SaaS AI will accelerate adoption, if it follows Cloud pattern - external forces are more motivated to attack business “change” than internal teams
[Build vs. Ecosystem] Do the LLM vendors become the application vendors? Where does the LLM start and stop (infra, platform, API, apps, etc.)
[Learning from the customers] Do the LLM vendors use their knowledge advantage to build the apps?
GenAI Apps Categories - Make something better, Replace something, Just do the thing
“AI is just whatever is wrong/broken now” - How well does AI understand “broken”
Will people be the biggest problem in AI progress?
[Decoupling] Looks at global markets for Internet today - ecommerce/retail, food delivery, advertising, media, autonomous driving,