Spotify vs. Songwriters (again)... and a 'likely' legal fight
Apr 30, 2024
auto_awesome
David Israelite, President and CEO of the National Music Publishers' Association, discusses Spotify's controversial decision to lower mechanical royalty rates for songwriters by reclassifying premium subscription tiers. The NMPA is considering legal action to challenge this move. The podcast delves into the impact on songwriters, concerns about transparency, and the ongoing conflicts between Spotify and music creators.
Spotify reclassifying premium tiers as 'bundles' to lower royalty rates for songwriters in the US.
NMPA considering legal action against Spotify to challenge the newly-lowered 'bundle' mechanical royalty rate.
Deep dives
Spotify's Recategorization and Impact on Songwriters
Spotify's decision to classify its premium tiers as bundles has significant implications for songwriters and music publishers in the US. By reclassifying their premium accounts, Spotify aims to lower the royalty rates paid to writers and publishers. This move follows a history of disputes between the NMPA and Spotify over royalty rates, with Spotify attempting to pay less to songwriters. The shift to bundle services allows Spotify to pay writers based on a percentage of the portion of the subscription attributed to music rather than audiobooks, potentially reducing the earnings of music rights holders.
Spotify's Business Strategy and Financial Impact
Spotify's decision to recategorize premium tiers aligns with their profit-focused strategy, emphasizing monetization and cost-saving measures. The emphasis on profitability includes reducing expenses and staff layoffs. The company's approach to bundling services reflects an attempt to minimize payments to songwriters while potentially increasing subscription prices. Additionally, Spotify's statements about paying more royalties in 2024 have been criticized as misleading, as they may not adequately compensate songwriters under the new rate structure.
Legal Challenges and Industry Response
The NMPA's potential legal challenge against Spotify underscores the contentious relationship between the two parties. Spotify's attempt to manipulate royalty rates through bundle classification could lead to legal conflicts. While specifics of legal action remain undisclosed, the situation highlights the need for fair treatment of songwriters and publishers in licensing agreements. The NMPA's focus on protecting songwriter rights against perceived exploitation by streaming services like Spotify signifies a broader industry concern over equitable compensation.
On this Music Business Worldwide podcast, MBW founder Tim Ingham is joined by David Israelite, the President and CEO of the National Music Publishers' Association.
We probably don't need to ask you to guess which particular controversial topic Israelite and Ingham discuss.
Earlier this month, Spotify announced that it was changing the way it calculates mechanical royalty payments for songwriters and publishers in the US.
Spotify has re-categorized its Premium subscription tiers in the States as 'bundles,' enabling it to pay out a lesser mechanical royalty rate to songwriters than it would if said Premium tiers were classified as pure music services.
Spotify believes it is entitled to re-categorize these tiers as 'bundles' due to the fact that SPOT now offers access to music plus audiobooks.
The idea that 'bundled' services should be entitled to a lower mechanical royalty rate (vs. standard music subscription services) was enshrined in the so-called 'CRB IV' agreement/settlement between publishers and Spotify in the States, signed in 2022, and covering the years 2023-2027.
As David Israelite explains on this podcast, the NMPA is currently considering legal action against Spotify that would seek to undo the newly-lowered 'bundle' mechanical royalty rate on the service.
This isn't the first time that Spotify and songwriters have butted heads, of course: In 2019, the US Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) decreed that Spotify and other streaming services needed to increase the headline mechanical royalty rates they paid publishers and songwriters in the US for the period covering 2018-2022.
That decision from the CRB (in the so-called 'CRB III' process) followed a campaign of lobbying and general legal cajoling from the NMPA, on behalf of songwriters and publishers.
Spotify (and Amazon) subsequently appealed this ('CRB III') ruling, attempting to drive down the mechanical royalty rate they paid songwriters under US law.
The CRB, though, stood firm – and told the streamers they must increase their rate.
Now, with its 'bundle' reclassification under 'CRB IV', Spotify is once again attempting to push down the percentage of its revenue that it must, by law, pay to songwriters and publishers in its biggest market.
Will Spotify ultimately get away with it? Stay tuned.
As Israelite confirms on this podcast: "This will likely end up in a legal conflict..."
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode