Advisory Opinions

Do You Have ‘Parental Rights’?

31 snips
Mar 20, 2025
The podcast dives into Chief Justice Roberts' rare rebuke of Trump regarding court criticism. A gripping historical context on judicial impeachment highlights the balance between independence and accountability. There’s an engaging debate on the McDonnell Douglas framework in employment law, along with insights into a 11th Circuit case on parental rights related to gender identity. The conversation also tackles age restrictions on gun purchases and a racially charged academic controversy, blending law with personal experiences.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

Impeachment Rebuke

  • Trump called for a judge's impeachment after a legal dispute.
  • Chief Justice Roberts responded, citing a historical precedent against such actions.
INSIGHT

DEI Order and Judicial Opinions

  • A Fourth Circuit decision saw judges criticize a DEI order while upholding its legality.
  • This highlights the tension between judicial roles and personal opinions.
INSIGHT

Criticizing Precedent

  • A debate arose about how judges should criticize precedent, with Orin Kerr arguing against it in opinions.
  • Michael Dorf suggested using other avenues like op-eds or law review articles.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app