In this intriguing discussion, Rachel Simmons, an expert on girls' leadership, sheds light on the challenges young men face today, emphasizing their feelings of marginalization. Nicholas Confessore, a New York Times journalist, tackles the complexities of diversity and inclusion at the University of Michigan, questioning the effectiveness of current DEI initiatives. The conversation also dives into the sociocultural issues affecting youth engagement in politics and the importance of addressing boys' struggles within empowerment movements.
The podcast explores Donald Trump's impulsive behavior, highlighting disinhibition as a key trait rather than cognitive decline with age.
Young men's political leanings towards Trump stem from feelings of societal abandonment, framing a backlash against perceived cultural biases favoring women.
Concerns arise regarding the effectiveness of the University of Michigan's DEI initiatives, as students express dissatisfaction despite significant investment and bureaucratic challenges.
Deep dives
The State of the Presidential Race
As the presidential race approaches its climax with just two weeks remaining, the discussion centers around the implications of early voting and its potential influence on the election outcome. Some analysts suggest that the increasing rate of early voting may indicate heightened enthusiasm among certain voter demographics, particularly Republicans, who appear to be voting in greater numbers compared to previous cycles. This trend raises questions about the effectiveness of campaign strategies and whether the voter turnout is indicative of genuine support for candidates or simply a reflection of problematic campaigning methods. Ultimately, these dynamics lead to significant speculation regarding the candidates’ potential performances on election day.
Disinhibition and Trump's Behavior
The notion of disinhibition is explored as a defining trait of Donald Trump’s behavior, separating it from a decline in cognitive abilities. Analysts argue that Trump's public impulsivity aligns with a personal characteristic that manifests more prominently with age, leading to concerns about the absence of restraint. This issue becomes critical as it intersects with the preparations for a potential second Trump presidency, where unchecked impulses could have serious ramifications. The systematic dismantling of institutional guardrails designed to constrain such behavior raises alarm about what a re-elected Trump might do.
Young Men's Support for Trump
The discussion emphasizes a concerning trend in which young men appear to gravitate towards Trump as they express feelings of abandonment by society. This phenomenon is attributed to a perceived cultural bias favoring women and girls at the expense of young men, creating an environment where they feel unsupported and overlooked. The dialogue around male identity and social roles indicates a possible backlash against the empowerment movements aimed at women, suggesting that unresolved issues related to masculinity contribute to political affiliations. As these men seek community and identity, Trump’s rhetoric resonates, adding complexity to voter dynamics in the current election landscape.
Critique of University DEI Initiatives
An investigation into the University of Michigan's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives reveals significant shortcomings and discontent among students. Despite an investment exceeding a quarter of a billion dollars, students, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds, express dissatisfaction with the programs and their effectiveness. Critics argue that the DEI efforts lack precision and clarity, leading to a sense of disillusionment in the face of bureaucracy that fails to address fundamental barriers to inclusion. Furthermore, the disconnect between institutional goals and student experiences underscores the challenges facing such initiatives in achieving meaningful change within higher education.
The Role of Political Language and Voter Sentiment
Political discourse surrounding the election increasingly involves the use of charged language, such as labeling Trump as a 'fascist,' which raises questions about its efficacy in swaying public opinion. While some prominent figures express concern about the implications of such terminology, others argue that it merely oversimplifies complex issues and may alienate potential voters. The challenge lies in communicating the urgency of possible consequences without resorting to polarizing language that fails to connect with everyday concerns of voters. This nuanced conversation reveals the delicate balance between effective messaging and maintaining broad electoral support in a fraught political landscape.
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss Donald Trump’s fascism, disinhibition, and age; the state of young men in America with Rachel Simmons; and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at the University of Michigan with Nicholas Confessore of The New York Times. Join us on December 4 for Political Gabfest Live in Brooklyn! Tickets are on sale now. And send us your Conundrums at slate.com/conundrum.
For this week’s Slate Plus bonus episode, Emily, John, and David talk about Elon Musk following Donald Trump.
Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.)
Podcast production by Cheyna Roth
Research by Julie Huygen
Want more Political Gabfest? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Political Gabfest show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or visit slate.com/gabfestplus to get access wherever you listen.
