In this podcast, the connection between a murder case and Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is explored, raising the question of whether Darwin was to blame. The aftermath of the murder reveals a cover-up, investigation, and unequal distribution of stolen money. The controversy surrounding Darwin and evolution is discussed, along with public opinion on Darwin's nomination to the French Academy of Sciences. Connections to the novel Crime and Punishment and Dostoyevsky's views on natural selection and morality are also highlighted.
The murder case and subsequent debate in French society sparked a renewed interest in Darwinism and ultimately led to a greater understanding and acceptance of his ideas in France.
The murderers in the case misunderstood and distorted Darwin's theories to justify their actions, highlighting the importance of distinguishing scientific theories from moral guidance.
Deep dives
The Sensational Murder of a Milkmaid and its Implications for Darwinism
In 19th-century Paris, the gruesome murder of a milkmaid was committed as an attempt to prove something about Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. The murderers believed in social Darwinism, the idea that the strong should dominate the weak. This murder raised a debate in French society about whether Darwin was to blame. The trial and subsequent negative publicity surrounding the murder sparked a campaign to destroy Darwin and his theory. However, as more people read about Darwin's actual theories, public opinion began to shift in his favor, and he was finally elected a member of the prestigious French Academy of Sciences. The murder and its aftermath caused a renewed interest in Darwinism and led to a greater understanding and acceptance of his ideas in France.
The Murders and the Distorted View of Darwinism
The two murderers, Barre and L'ubier, had personal motives for killing the milkmaid, including financial desperation and a belief in social Darwinism. They distorted Darwin's theories to justify their actions, but their understanding of Darwinism was flawed. They believed in the survival of the fittest and saw themselves as the strong dominating the weak. However, Darwinism does not provide guidance on morals, and it is up to individuals and society to determine ethical principles. The murder case became a catalyst for a public debate on Darwinism and its implications, with some using it as an opportunity to attack Darwin's theory.
The Shift in Public Opinion and Acceptance of Darwin
Despite the negative publicity surrounding the murder trial, the public's curiosity about Darwinism grew, leading to a more balanced and informed understanding of Darwin's theories. As newspapers explained Darwin's ideas, public opinion gradually shifted in favor of Darwin. Many scientists, previously hesitant to speak up for Darwin, started expressing support for his theories, further influencing public perception. The unexpected election of Darwin as a member of the French Academy of Sciences in the midst of the murder trial signaled a turning point in public opinion and a rejection of the attempts to destroy Darwin and his evolutionary theory.
In 1878, two Paris dandies murdered an old woman—and blamed Charles Darwin for their crime. But the wild scandal that followed only solidified Darwin as the greatest scientist of his age...