“Did Christopher Hitchens change his mind about waterboarding? ” by Isaac King
Sep 17, 2024
auto_awesome
Christopher Hitchens, a prominent author and journalist known for his candid political and ethical insights, examines his controversial views on waterboarding. He reflects on how his firsthand experience shifted his position from supporting the practice to recognizing it as torture. The discussion delves into the implications of his views in the context of the post-9/11 landscape, as well as how both fans and detractors interpret his intellectual honesty. Hitchens’ journey reveals the complexities surrounding morality and torture in modern discourse.
Christopher Hitchens initially supported waterboarding, but after experiencing it, he declared it torture, igniting debate on his intellectual honesty.
The ambiguity surrounding Hitchens' evolving perspective reveals that claims about his change of heart often lack solid evidence and clear citation.
Deep dives
Christopher Hitchens and the Waterboarding Debate
The discussion surrounding Christopher Hitchens and his views on waterboarding highlights the complexity of his stance on the issue. Initially, he appeared to be open to the use of waterboarding, evidenced by his statements prior to undergoing the procedure himself. However, after experiencing it firsthand, he publicly declared it as torture, which sparked significant debate about his intellectual honesty. This shift in perspective has been debated by both his supporters and critics, with neither side fully confirming the specifics of his changed beliefs.
The Inconsistencies in Claims
Many claims regarding Hitchens’ evolving perspective on waterboarding lack solid evidence and are often repeated without proper citation. While some argue he changed his mind after the waterboarding experience, others point to articles he wrote prior that suggest he might not have viewed it as torture at all. A critical examination reveals that sources often cited to support these claims do not provide concrete evidence to back up the assertions. This kind of ambiguity helps maintain a narrative that is appealing to both sides of the debate but lacks thorough substantiation.
Perspectives from Those Close to Hitchens
In seeking clarity, insights from individuals who had personal interactions with Hitchens reveal differing accounts of his beliefs. Malcolm Nance, a military officer who communicated with Hitchens regarding the practice of waterboarding, indicated that Hitchens was initially supportive of it before changing his viewpoint after the experience. However, there remains skepticism about the reliability of personal testimonies, as individuals like Nance tend to have emotional and subjective interpretations. Ultimately, despite the conflicting narratives, the evidence suggestively points towards Hitchens experiencing a shift in his views on the morality of waterboarding.
1.
Exploring the Truth Behind Hitchens' Waterboarding Stance
There's a popular story that goes like this: Christopher Hitchens used to be in favor of the US waterboarding terrorists because he though it's wasn't bad enough to be torture.. Then he had it tried on himself, and changed his mind, coming to believe it isn't torture.
(Context for those unfamiliar: in the decade following 9/11, the US engaged in a lot of... questionable behavior to persecute the war on terror, and there was a big debate on whether waterboarding should be permitted. Many other public figures also volunteered to undergo the procedure as a part of this public debate; most notably Sean Hannity, who was an outspoken proponent of waterboarding, yet welched on his offer and never tried it himself.)
This story intrigued me because it's popular among both Hitchens' fans and his detractors. His fans use it as an example of his intellectual honesty and willingness to [...]