AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Snipd AI
Loyola Law School Professor Jessica Levinson discusses Trump's immunity claims at the Supreme Court. Topics include the arguments presented, the potential ruling, and the broader legal implications for future presidents. Insightful analysis on the complexities of defining immunity and the impact on criminal prosecutions.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Supreme Court is unlikely to grant absolute presidential immunity, opting for a nuanced middle-ground approach.
- The legal process length and complexity could delay the trial, potentially benefiting Trump's legal strategy.
Deep dives
Supreme Court's Stance on Presidential Immunity
According to legal expert Jessica Levinson, the Supreme Court is unlikely to grant absolute presidential immunity nor completely eliminate immunity for former presidents facing criminal charges. The court is expected to establish a middle-ground approach where certain actions may be shielded from prosecution under immunity, while others would not be protected, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the boundaries of immunity.
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode