Trump’s Immunity Claims: How will the Justices Rule? | Sunday Extra
Apr 28, 2024
auto_awesome
Loyola Law School Professor Jessica Levinson discusses Trump's immunity claims at the Supreme Court. Topics include the arguments presented, the potential ruling, and the broader legal implications for future presidents. Insightful analysis on the complexities of defining immunity and the impact on criminal prosecutions.
The Supreme Court is unlikely to grant absolute presidential immunity, opting for a nuanced middle-ground approach.
The legal process length and complexity could delay the trial, potentially benefiting Trump's legal strategy.
Deep dives
Supreme Court's Stance on Presidential Immunity
According to legal expert Jessica Levinson, the Supreme Court is unlikely to grant absolute presidential immunity nor completely eliminate immunity for former presidents facing criminal charges. The court is expected to establish a middle-ground approach where certain actions may be shielded from prosecution under immunity, while others would not be protected, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the boundaries of immunity.
Lengthy Legal Process Ahead
The podcast highlights the complexity and length of the legal process surrounding the case. Following the Supreme Court's ruling, which is anticipated by the end of June, the trial court will need to apply the new standard set forth by the court. This process could involve further appeals and implications for the trial proceedings, leading to a delayed timeline, ultimately benefiting Trump's legal strategy by potentially pushing the trial beyond the next election.
Arguments and Implications of the Case
The case presents arguments from both Team Trump and the federal government regarding presidential immunity. Team Trump emphasizes the distinguished treatment of presidents in certain legal aspects, while the government underscores the lack of explicit constitutional immunity clauses for presidents. Further deliberations by the justices point towards defining a standard for presidential accountability and the potential impact on criminal charges against Trump in other ongoing federal cases.
The Supreme Court heard Trump’s immunity claims on Thursday. Loyola Law School Professor Jessica Levinson breaks down both sides of the argument and how she thinks the judges will rule. Get the facts first on Morning Wire.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode