Learn about the potential collapse of the free speech trial of the century and the plaintiff's misconduct. Dive into the manipulation of data in Michael Mann's hockey stick graph and hear a witness condemn climate celebrities. Discover the controversy surrounding the graph and the need for open debate in the scientific community. Explore false evidence and alleged misconduct during the trial that damages Dr. Mann's credibility. The hosts discuss the trial's end and appeal for support.
The plaintiff's counsel presented false evidence of grant funding loss, undermining the credibility of the trial.
Dr. Mann's damages case lacks evidence of actual injury and fails to establish causation.
Dr. Curry's testimony highlights the importance of academic integrity and transparent forecasting in climate science debate.
Deep dives
Misleading Evidence Presented Regarding Grant Loss
During the trial, false and misleading evidence was presented to the jury regarding Dr. Mann's alleged loss of grant funding. This evidence was known to be false by the plaintiff's counsel, who deliberately presented it. The evidence included an exhibit and testimony that contained incorrect information about the dollar amounts of the allegedly lost grants. This misconduct by the plaintiff's counsel is a serious harm to the defendants and an insult to the jury and the court.
Absence of Actual Injury and Causation for Damages
Dr. Mann's damages case lacks evidence of actual injury and fails to establish causation between the alleged defamation and the alleged loss of grant funding. The evidence presented by Dr. Mann was based on a paper pad summary, which did not provide specific details about the grants allegedly lost. Furthermore, correlation does not equal causation, and Dr. Mann does not claim that the blog posts caused a decline in funding. The lack of damages evidence undermines Dr. Mann's case.
Tenor of the Climate Science Debate and Dr. Curry's Testimony
The tenor of the climate science debate has changed over time, with increased politicization and concerns about the process of the IPCC. Dr. Curry, a highly qualified climate scientist, testified about the difference between academic scientists and those in the private sector, emphasizing the importance of accurate and transparent forecasting. She also recounted her experiences in Congress, where she was referred to as a climate denier by Dr. Mann and faced false testimony from him.
Importance of Academic Integrity and Scientific Debate
Dr. Curry emphasized the importance of academic integrity and expressed concern about the lack of transparency and uncertainties in the IPCC's conclusions. She highlighted her own extensive qualifications and experiences, including advising companies on weather forecasts and serving as president of a climate forecasting business. Dr. Curry's testimony underscores the need for respectful scientific debate and the protection of freedom of speech.
Evidence of Bad Faith Trial Misconduct
Mark Stein submitted a motion alleging bad faith trial misconduct by Dr. Mann and his lawyers. The motion claims that false evidence regarding grant loss was presented to the jury, despite counsel's knowledge of its inaccuracies. This misconduct is argued to have harmed the defendants, insulted the jury, and undermined the public's perception of the justice system. Stein requests sanctions, including the exclusion of the false evidence and an award of reasonable attorney's fees.
Is the free speech trial of the century about to collapse? Did Michael Mann's lawyers deliberately show an error-filled document to the jury? High drama in the DC Superior Court as the defendants push for the dismissal of all charges because of the plaintiff's misconduct. Even the judge seemed appalled.
Speaking of dodgy figures, listen as an expert statistician explains how Mann manipulated data to produce the hockey stick graph.
And, hear a witness condemn “jet-setting climate celebrities who are calling me a denier”. Who could she be referring to?
And we tackle the biggest question of all: Will the jury ever turn up on time?
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
