Welcome to the Machine: Onwards to Transhumanism with Dr. Steve Fuller
Mar 1, 2024
auto_awesome
Dr. Steve Fuller, Auguste Comte Chair in Social Epistemology, discusses transhumanism's history, genetic programming, theological intersections, morphological freedom, and risks in scientific experiments. The podcast explores Galileo's telescope discoveries, faith in science, post-humanism, and the balance between scientific progress and ethical considerations.
Advocacy for gene editing and genetic enhancement to direct human evolution stems from Julian Huxley's vision of self-directed evolution.
The intertwining of theological frameworks with scientific history portrays humans as 'fallen gods' seeking to regain divine entitlement.
The debate between the pro-actionary and precautionary principles reflects the challenge of balancing innovation and safety in scientific exploration.
Deep dives
Julian Huxley's Vision of Transhumanism in the 1950s
Julian Huxley, influenced by his evolutionary beliefs, envisioned a future where humans could direct their own evolution through advanced genetic modification. This idea stemmed from a belief that Homo sapiens could understand and control their evolutionary trajectory. He advocated for a high-grade eugenics program utilizing technologies like gene editing and genetic enhancement, setting the stage for modern transhumanism.
Humans as Fallen Gods and the Theological Underpinnings of Science
The concept of humans as 'fallen gods' intertwines theological frameworks with the history of science. Stemming from Abrahamic beliefs, the idea suggests that humans possess divine entitlement but have strayed from it, leading to the quest to regain this status. This viewpoint fueled early scientific pioneers who saw humanity as capable of transcending its current state through bold experimentation, culminating in the rise of modern science.
Pro-Actionary vs. Precautionary Principles in Science and Innovation
The pro-actionary principle advocates for embracing risk and pushing boundaries in scientific exploration, viewing progress as intertwined with acceptance of inevitable errors. In contrast, the precautionary principle cautions against radical experimentation to prevent harm, often leading to restrictions on risky research endeavors. These contrasting attitudes highlight debates around balancing innovation with safety in scientific pursuits.
Balancing Scientific Advancements and Ethical Considerations
The podcast delves into the ethical dilemmas surrounding scientific progress, questioning the balance between the potential benefits and the costs in terms of human and non-human lives. It discusses the concept of minimizing harm while striving for advancements, highlighting the necessity of exploring the limits of acceptable risks and the implications of the precautionary principle.
The Role of Informed Consent in Risky Scientific Experiments
Another key point raised is the importance of informed consent in risky scientific experiments. The episode advocates for individuals to engage in private contracts with scientists, allowing for informed decision-making and compensation in case of harm. It emphasizes the need for a shift towards individual empowerment and away from institutional restrictions that hinder progress in scientific research involving human participants.
Steve Fuller, PhD, graduated from Columbia University in History & Sociology before gaining a Masters in Philosophy from Cambridge and a PhD from Pittsburgh in History and the Philosophy of Science. He currently holds the Auguste Comte Chair in Social Epistemology in the Department of Sociology at the University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
He is the author of 26 books and numerous academic papers.
for two full episodes a month and exclusive content please visit patreon.com/thenickbryantpodcast
Welcome to the Machine: Onwards to Transhumanism with Dr. Steve Fuller | The Nick Bryant Podcast https://youtu.be/r1SrIIfsp48