The Editors Episode 828: Indictment Collapse
22 snips
Nov 25, 2025 The panel dissects the legal flaws of the dismissed indictments against Comey and James, debating the political risks of vengeance-driven prosecutions. Trump's meeting with Mamdani raises eyebrows, prompting concerns about normalization and rhetorical tactics. The hosts humorously ponder hypothetical campaign promises, while also reflecting on America as a creedal nation. Thanksgiving traditions spark lively debates, from football picks to the merits of canned versus homemade cranberry sauce. It's a blend of insightful analysis and festive fun.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Indictments Failed From Legal Sloppiness
- The Comey and Letitia James indictments collapsed mainly from procedural and competence failures, not purely politics.
- Rushed prosecutions and weak staffing undercut the administration's vengeance campaign and risk political blowback.
Opportunity And Optics Sank The Cases
- The prosecution effort looked opportunistic: departures, rushed appointments, and statute-of-limitations pressure.
- That pattern invites defenses of malicious or politically motivated prosecution in court and public debate.
Retribution Carries Political Opportunity Cost
- Vengeance-focused politics diverts from voters' main priorities like the economy and affordability.
- Pursuing personal retribution without strong legal foundations wastes political capital and risks negative outcomes.
